Gale H. Roid

1.2k total citations
41 papers, 502 citations indexed

About

Gale H. Roid is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Gale H. Roid has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 502 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 10 papers in Education and 9 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Gale H. Roid's work include Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (7 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (6 papers) and Educational and Psychological Assessments (5 papers). Gale H. Roid is often cited by papers focused on Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (7 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (6 papers) and Educational and Psychological Assessments (5 papers). Gale H. Roid collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Germany. Gale H. Roid's co-authors include Thomas M. Haladyna, Tom Haladyna, Aurelio Prifitera, Mark Ledbetter, Mark Pomplun, Willi Horner‐Johnson, Rie Suzuki, Jana J. Peterson, Gloria L. Krahn and Mandi W. Musso and has published in prestigious journals such as American Psychologist, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and Computers in Human Behavior.

In The Last Decade

Gale H. Roid

35 papers receiving 422 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Gale H. Roid United States 11 167 123 90 81 77 41 502
Ronald B. Livingston United States 9 181 1.1× 87 0.7× 49 0.5× 60 0.7× 17 0.2× 25 450
Anat Ben-Simon Israel 10 92 0.6× 73 0.6× 93 1.0× 37 0.5× 46 0.6× 12 355
Sharon Cadman Slater United States 11 252 1.5× 95 0.8× 22 0.2× 31 0.4× 60 0.8× 18 490
Karen Draney United States 7 152 0.9× 89 0.7× 25 0.3× 57 0.7× 178 2.3× 22 513
Susan J. Maller United States 13 74 0.4× 186 1.5× 52 0.6× 155 1.9× 137 1.8× 27 572
Damien C. Cormier Canada 13 197 1.2× 269 2.2× 53 0.6× 96 1.2× 45 0.6× 45 514
Joseph C. Kush United States 16 281 1.7× 407 3.3× 45 0.5× 254 3.1× 97 1.3× 39 743
Catherine Trapani United States 13 168 1.0× 219 1.8× 109 1.2× 39 0.5× 72 0.9× 33 728
Thomas Quinlan United States 14 334 2.0× 249 2.0× 33 0.4× 59 0.7× 22 0.3× 19 767
Xuezhu Ren China 14 164 1.0× 136 1.1× 153 1.7× 252 3.1× 33 0.4× 41 582

Countries citing papers authored by Gale H. Roid

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gale H. Roid's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gale H. Roid with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gale H. Roid more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gale H. Roid

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gale H. Roid. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gale H. Roid. The network helps show where Gale H. Roid may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gale H. Roid

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gale H. Roid. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gale H. Roid based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gale H. Roid. Gale H. Roid is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Roid, Gale H. & Mark Pomplun. (2020). SB5: Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, Fifth Edition. edoc (University of Basel). 15 indexed citations
2.
Krahn, Gloria L., Willi Horner‐Johnson, Gale H. Roid, et al.. (2013). Development and Psychometric Assessment of the Function-Neutral Health-Related Quality of Life Measure. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 93(1). 56–74. 15 indexed citations
3.
Musso, Mandi W., et al.. (2013). Unreliable Block Span Reveals Simulated Intellectual Disability on the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales-Fifth Edition. Applied Neuropsychology Adult. 21(1). 51–59. 23 indexed citations
4.
Musso, Mandi W., et al.. (2011). Development and Validation of the Stanford Binet-5 Rarely Missed Items-Nonverbal Index for the Detection of Malingered Mental Retardation. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 26(8). 756–767. 9 indexed citations
5.
Horner‐Johnson, Willi, Gloria L. Krahn, Rie Suzuki, et al.. (2010). Differential Performance of SF-36 Items in Healthy Adults With and Without Functional Limitations. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 91(4). 570–575. 31 indexed citations
6.
O’Donnell, Susan, et al.. (2008). Father Closeness: Its Effect on Married Men's Sexual Behaviors, Marital, and Family Satisfaction. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity The Journal of Treatment and Prevention. 15(1). 59–76. 10 indexed citations
7.
Roid, Gale H., et al.. (2005). An Interview with Gale Roid About the Stanford-Binet 5. North American journal of psychology. 7(3). 1. 3 indexed citations
8.
Roid, Gale H., et al.. (2004). Essentials of Stanford-Binet intelligence scales (SB5) assessment. John Wiley & Sons eBooks. 49 indexed citations
9.
Roid, Gale H.. (2004). Quality of Performance and Change-Sensitive Assessment of Cognitive Ability. ACEReSearch (Australian Council for Educational Research). 2 indexed citations
10.
Roid, Gale H., et al.. (2004). No Evidence for Ethnic and Racial Bias in the Tryout Edition of the Merrill-Palmer Scale—Revised. Psychological Reports. 94(1). 217–220. 3 indexed citations
11.
Roid, Gale H., et al.. (1997). Replication of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children--Third edition four-factor model in the Canadian normative sample.. Psychological Assessment. 9(4). 512–515. 1 indexed citations
12.
Roid, Gale H.. (1994). Patterns of Writing Skills Derived From Cluster Analysis of Direct-Writing Assessments. Applied Measurement in Education. 7(2). 159–170. 35 indexed citations
13.
Roid, Gale H., Aurelio Prifitera, & Mark Ledbetter. (1988). Confirmatory analysis of the factor structure of the wechsler memory scale-revised. Clinical Neuropsychologist. 2(2). 116–120. 37 indexed citations
14.
Miller, Lovick C. & Gale H. Roid. (1988). Factor-analytically derived scales for the Louisville Behavior Checklist.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 56(2). 302–304. 7 indexed citations
15.
Wendler, Cathy & Gale H. Roid. (1984). A Cost Analysis Approach to Optimizing Test Selection. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 17(7). 400–405. 1 indexed citations
16.
Haladyna, Thomas M. & Gale H. Roid. (1983). A COMPARISON OF TWO APPROACHES TO CRITERION‐REFERENCED TEST CONSTRUCTION. Journal of Educational Measurement. 20(3). 271–282. 5 indexed citations
17.
Haladyna, Tom & Gale H. Roid. (1981). THE ROLE OF INSTRUCTIONAL SENSITIVITY IN THE EMPIRICAL REVIEW OF CRITERION‐REFERENCED TEST ITEMS. Journal of Educational Measurement. 18(1). 39–53. 32 indexed citations
18.
Roid, Gale H.. (1974). Selecting CAI Author Languages to Solve Instructional Problems.. Educational Technology archive. 1 indexed citations
19.
Roid, Gale H., et al.. (1973). A Method for Generating and Evaluating Course or Departmental Objectives..
20.
Roid, Gale H.. (1972). Systems Design for Course Evaluation.. 19(6). 776–787. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026