Mark C. Fox

782 total citations
10 papers, 488 citations indexed

About

Mark C. Fox is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark C. Fox has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 488 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 5 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 3 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Mark C. Fox's work include Cognitive Abilities and Testing (6 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (3 papers) and Memory Processes and Influences (3 papers). Mark C. Fox is often cited by papers focused on Cognitive Abilities and Testing (6 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (3 papers) and Memory Processes and Influences (3 papers). Mark C. Fox collaborates with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Mark C. Fox's co-authors include Ryan Best, K. Anders Ericsson, Ainsley Mitchum, Colleen M. Kelley, Neil Charness, Jane M. Berry, Roy W. Roring and Katinka Dijkstra and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Bulletin, PLoS ONE and Journal of Experimental Psychology General.

In The Last Decade

Mark C. Fox

9 papers receiving 469 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark C. Fox United States 8 178 173 160 82 63 10 488
Sharon Bertsch United States 5 139 0.8× 112 0.6× 129 0.8× 92 1.1× 50 0.8× 14 372
Ainsley Mitchum United States 7 168 0.9× 101 0.6× 176 1.1× 103 1.3× 81 1.3× 14 512
J. Isaiah Harbison United States 11 285 1.6× 204 1.2× 166 1.0× 45 0.5× 48 0.8× 23 636
Noriko Coburn United States 3 165 0.9× 103 0.6× 117 0.7× 88 1.1× 36 0.6× 3 409
James A. Kole United States 11 132 0.7× 92 0.5× 78 0.5× 66 0.8× 62 1.0× 27 391
William C. Tirre United States 12 122 0.7× 226 1.3× 162 1.0× 53 0.6× 79 1.3× 30 448
Daniel P. Blakely United States 4 166 0.9× 172 1.0× 280 1.8× 31 0.4× 68 1.1× 9 537
Greg Perfetto United States 10 119 0.7× 227 1.3× 127 0.8× 47 0.6× 150 2.4× 14 496
Lothar Schmidt-Atzert Germany 13 118 0.7× 104 0.6× 183 1.1× 131 1.6× 64 1.0× 42 468
Robert Gaschler Germany 14 163 0.9× 109 0.6× 106 0.7× 95 1.2× 67 1.1× 68 528

Countries citing papers authored by Mark C. Fox

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark C. Fox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark C. Fox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark C. Fox more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark C. Fox

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark C. Fox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark C. Fox. The network helps show where Mark C. Fox may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark C. Fox

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark C. Fox. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark C. Fox based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark C. Fox. Mark C. Fox is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Mitchum, Ainsley, Colleen M. Kelley, & Mark C. Fox. (2016). When asking the question changes the ultimate answer: Metamemory judgments change memory.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 145(2). 200–219. 105 indexed citations
2.
Fox, Mark C., et al.. (2016). The role of encoding strategy in younger and older adult associative recognition: A think-aloud analysis.. Psychology and Aging. 31(5). 471–480. 8 indexed citations
3.
Fox, Mark C., et al.. (2014). Are vocabulary tests measurement invariant between age groups? An item response analysis of three popular tests.. Psychology and Aging. 29(4). 925–938. 6 indexed citations
5.
Fox, Mark C. & Ainsley Mitchum. (2012). A knowledge-based theory of rising scores on “culture-free” tests.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 142(3). 979–1000. 30 indexed citations
6.
Fox, Mark C., K. Anders Ericsson, & Ryan Best. (2010). Do procedures for verbal reporting of thinking have to be reactive? A meta-analysis and recommendations for best reporting methods.. Psychological Bulletin. 137(2). 316–344. 286 indexed citations
7.
Fox, Mark C. & Neil Charness. (2009). How to Gain Eleven IQ Points in Ten Minutes: Thinking Aloud Improves Raven's Matrices Performance in Older Adults. Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition. 17(2). 191–204. 28 indexed citations
8.
Dijkstra, Katinka, et al.. (2009). Changes in Physiological Stress and Self-Reported Mood in Younger and Older Adults After Exposure to a Stressful Task. Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition. 16(3). 338–356. 9 indexed citations
9.
Fox, Mark C., Roy W. Roring, & Ainsley Mitchum. (2008). Reversing the speed–IQ correlation: Intra-individual variability and attentional control in the inspection time paradigm. Intelligence. 37(1). 76–80. 9 indexed citations
10.
Fox, Mark C.. (2008). Effects of Age and Concurrent Verbalization on Cognitive Task Performance.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026