J. Isaiah Harbison

894 total citations
23 papers, 636 citations indexed

About

J. Isaiah Harbison is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, J. Isaiah Harbison has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 636 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 9 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 6 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in J. Isaiah Harbison's work include Memory Processes and Influences (7 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (5 papers) and Educational and Psychological Assessments (4 papers). J. Isaiah Harbison is often cited by papers focused on Memory Processes and Influences (7 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (5 papers) and Educational and Psychological Assessments (4 papers). J. Isaiah Harbison collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. J. Isaiah Harbison's co-authors include Michael R. Dougherty, Amber Sprenger, Rick P. Thomas, Jared M. Novick, Michael F. Bunting, Erika K. Hussey, Susan Teubner‐Rhodes, Sharona M. Atkins, Eddy J. Davelaar and Donald J. Bolger and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Review, Cognition and Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition.

In The Last Decade

J. Isaiah Harbison

22 papers receiving 585 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
J. Isaiah Harbison United States 11 285 204 166 106 71 23 636
Douglas A. Bors Canada 13 200 0.7× 164 0.8× 340 2.0× 106 1.0× 47 0.7× 20 679
David Wiebe Canada 3 239 0.8× 93 0.5× 299 1.8× 92 0.9× 48 0.7× 4 596
Hamutal Kreiner Israel 13 211 0.7× 187 0.9× 109 0.7× 55 0.5× 47 0.7× 38 460
John O. Mitterer Canada 13 276 1.0× 199 1.0× 124 0.7× 46 0.4× 55 0.8× 33 639
Kandi Jo Turley-Ames United States 8 247 0.9× 194 1.0× 260 1.6× 49 0.5× 77 1.1× 9 556
Dan J. Woltz United States 17 443 1.6× 328 1.6× 278 1.7× 128 1.2× 51 0.7× 41 919
Jason Geller United States 13 309 1.1× 153 0.8× 226 1.4× 56 0.5× 146 2.1× 20 828
Brian D. Glass United States 11 197 0.7× 182 0.9× 183 1.1× 91 0.9× 66 0.9× 19 545
Raymond E. Sanders United States 17 576 2.0× 284 1.4× 255 1.5× 73 0.7× 69 1.0× 37 932
Mark C. Fox United States 8 178 0.6× 173 0.8× 160 1.0× 62 0.6× 29 0.4× 10 488

Countries citing papers authored by J. Isaiah Harbison

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Isaiah Harbison's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Isaiah Harbison with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Isaiah Harbison more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Isaiah Harbison

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Isaiah Harbison. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Isaiah Harbison. The network helps show where J. Isaiah Harbison may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Isaiah Harbison

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Isaiah Harbison. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Isaiah Harbison based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Isaiah Harbison. J. Isaiah Harbison is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hussey, Erika K., et al.. (2016). Memory and language improvements following cognitive control training.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 43(1). 23–58. 38 indexed citations
2.
Dougherty, Michael R., J. Isaiah Harbison, & Eddy J. Davelaar. (2014). Optional Stopping and the Termination of Memory Retrieval. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 23(5). 332–337. 8 indexed citations
3.
Atkins, Sharona M., Amber Sprenger, Gregory J. H. Colflesh, et al.. (2014). Measuring Working Memory Is All Fun and Games. Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie). 61(6). 417–438. 30 indexed citations
4.
Campbell, Susan G., et al.. (2014). Cognitive engineering analysis training. 9–13. 2 indexed citations
5.
Harbison, J. Isaiah, et al.. (2013). Intrusions and the Decision to Terminate Memory Search.. Cognitive Science. 35(35). 2 indexed citations
6.
Hussey, Erika K., Michael R. Dougherty, J. Isaiah Harbison, & Eddy J. Davelaar. (2013). Retrieval Dynamics in Self-Terminated Memory Search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 67(2). 394–416. 2 indexed citations
7.
Novick, Jared M., Erika K. Hussey, Susan Teubner‐Rhodes, J. Isaiah Harbison, & Michael F. Bunting. (2013). Clearing the garden-path: improving sentence processing through cognitive control training. Language Cognition and Neuroscience. 29(2). 186–217. 114 indexed citations
8.
Davelaar, Eddy J., et al.. (2013). A rational approach to memory search termination. Cognitive Systems Research. 24. 96–103. 5 indexed citations
9.
Harbison, J. Isaiah, Sharona M. Atkins, & Michael R. Dougherty. (2012). N-back Performance: Comparing Assessment and Training Performance. Cognitive Science. 34(34). 2 indexed citations
10.
Harbison, J. Isaiah, Sharona M. Atkins, & Michael R. Dougherty. (2011). N-back Training Task Performance: Analysis and Model. Cognitive Science. 33(33). 13 indexed citations
11.
Harbison, J. Isaiah, et al.. (2011). The Interaction between Specific and General Information in Category Learning and Representation: Unitization and Parallel Interactive Processing. The American Journal of Psychology. 124(1). 1–22. 2 indexed citations
12.
Harbison, J. Isaiah, et al.. (2009). On the lawfulness of the decision to terminate memory search. Cognition. 111(3). 397–402. 31 indexed citations
13.
Thomas, Rick P., Michael R. Dougherty, Amber Sprenger, & J. Isaiah Harbison. (2008). Diagnostic hypothesis generation and human judgment.. Psychological Review. 115(1). 155–185. 146 indexed citations
14.
Dougherty, Michael R. & J. Isaiah Harbison. (2007). Motivated to retrieve: How often are you willing to go back to the well when the well is dry?. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 33(6). 1108–1117. 32 indexed citations
15.
Singleton, Jerome F., et al.. (1993). A Study of the Factual Knowledge and Common Misperceptions About Aging Held by Health Care Professionals. Activities Adaptation & Aging. 18(1). 37–47. 5 indexed citations
16.
Harbison, J. Isaiah, et al.. (1989). The curriculum in small schools in Northern Ireland and Scotland. Irish Educational Studies. 8(2). 117–137. 2 indexed citations
17.
Harbison, J. Isaiah. (1989). Growing up in Northern Ireland. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 46 indexed citations
18.
Harbison, J. Isaiah, et al.. (1988). Making sense of condoned absenteeism ‐ parents’ and pupils’ view. Irish Educational Studies. 7(1). 166–182. 1 indexed citations
19.
Harbison, J. Isaiah. (1983). Children of the troubles: Children in Northern Ireland. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique). 20 indexed citations
20.
Harbison, J. Isaiah, et al.. (1980). A Society under stress : children and young people in Northern Ireland. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 39 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026