Aurelio Prifitera

2.8k total citations
39 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Aurelio Prifitera is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Aurelio Prifitera has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 11 papers in Clinical Psychology and 9 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Aurelio Prifitera's work include Cognitive Abilities and Testing (12 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (6 papers) and Health and Well-being Studies (5 papers). Aurelio Prifitera is often cited by papers focused on Cognitive Abilities and Testing (12 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (6 papers) and Health and Well-being Studies (5 papers). Aurelio Prifitera collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. Aurelio Prifitera's co-authors include Joseph J. Ryan, Lawrence G. Weiss, Samuel J. Rosenberg, Donald H. Saklofske, Dean C. Delis, Edith Kaplan, Louise O’Donnell, Joseph D. Matarazzo, Jeffrey Dersh and Joel H. Kramer and has published in prestigious journals such as American Psychologist, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and Psychological Assessment.

In The Last Decade

Aurelio Prifitera

39 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Aurelio Prifitera United States 19 431 386 341 336 178 39 1.4k
Catalina J. Hooper United States 8 377 0.9× 643 1.7× 233 0.7× 299 0.9× 300 1.7× 8 1.3k
Lawrence C. Hartlage United States 16 191 0.4× 262 0.7× 234 0.7× 317 0.9× 228 1.3× 99 1.1k
María Beatriz Jurado United States 6 292 0.7× 635 1.6× 291 0.9× 398 1.2× 222 1.2× 11 1.3k
Paul D. Retzlaff United States 19 295 0.7× 379 1.0× 191 0.6× 452 1.3× 665 3.7× 56 1.7k
John E. Obrzut United States 22 213 0.5× 943 2.4× 815 2.4× 256 0.8× 127 0.7× 102 1.7k
Feggy Ostrosky‐Solís Mexico 25 341 0.8× 932 2.4× 492 1.4× 709 2.1× 140 0.8× 77 2.3k
Jan Richard United States 14 424 1.0× 727 1.9× 133 0.4× 461 1.4× 344 1.9× 21 1.5k
Esmeralda Matute Mexico 16 217 0.5× 418 1.1× 502 1.5× 311 0.9× 149 0.8× 66 1.4k
Rachael‐Anne Knight United Kingdom 17 353 0.8× 214 0.6× 161 0.5× 164 0.5× 278 1.6× 43 1.2k
Lawrence G. Weiss United States 19 622 1.4× 188 0.5× 379 1.1× 199 0.6× 129 0.7× 43 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Aurelio Prifitera

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Aurelio Prifitera's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aurelio Prifitera with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aurelio Prifitera more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Aurelio Prifitera

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Aurelio Prifitera. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Aurelio Prifitera. The network helps show where Aurelio Prifitera may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Aurelio Prifitera

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Aurelio Prifitera. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Aurelio Prifitera based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Aurelio Prifitera. Aurelio Prifitera is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Weiss, Lawrence G., Donald H. Saklofske, James A. Holdnack, & Aurelio Prifitera. (2015). WISC-V Assessment and Interpretation : Scientist-Practitioner Perspectives. 38 indexed citations
2.
Prifitera, Aurelio, Donald H. Saklofske, & Lawrence G. Weiss. (2008). WISC-IV Clinical Assessment and Intervention. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 91 indexed citations
3.
Steen, R. Grant, et al.. (2005). Cognitive Deficits in Children With Sickle Cell Disease. Journal of Child Neurology. 20(2). 102–107. 90 indexed citations
4.
Naglieri, Jack A., Fritz Drasgow, Mark J. Schmit, et al.. (2004). Psychological Testing on the Internet: New Problems, Old Issues.. American Psychologist. 59(3). 150–162. 142 indexed citations
5.
Kramer, Joel H., Dean C. Delis, Edith Kaplan, Louise O’Donnell, & Aurelio Prifitera. (1997). Developmental sex differences in verbal learning.. Neuropsychology. 11(4). 577–584. 14 indexed citations
6.
Weiss, Lawrence G. & Aurelio Prifitera. (1995). An evaluation of differential prediction of WIAT achievement scores from WISC-III FSIQ across ethnic and gender groups. Journal of School Psychology. 33(4). 297–304. 30 indexed citations
7.
Prifitera, Aurelio, et al.. (1991). Frequency of Verbal and Performance IQ Discrepancies on the WPPSI-R at Various Levels of Ability. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. 9(3). 230–239. 12 indexed citations
8.
Matarazzo, Joseph D. & Aurelio Prifitera. (1989). Subtest scatter and premorbid intelligence: Lessons from the WAIS--R standardization sample.. Psychological Assessment. 1(3). 186–191. 1 indexed citations
9.
Bornstein, Robert A., Gordon J. Chelune, & Aurelio Prifitera. (1989). IQ-memory discrepancies in normal and clinical samples.. Psychological Assessment. 1(3). 203–206. 16 indexed citations
10.
Roid, Gale H., Aurelio Prifitera, & Mark Ledbetter. (1988). Confirmatory analysis of the factor structure of the wechsler memory scale-revised. Clinical Neuropsychologist. 2(2). 116–120. 37 indexed citations
11.
Matarazzo, Joseph D., et al.. (1988). Inter-subtest scatter in the WAIS-R standardization sample. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 44(6). 940–950. 55 indexed citations
12.
Delis, Dean C., et al.. (1988). Wechsler memory scale-revised and california verbal learning test: Convergence and divergence. Clinical Neuropsychologist. 2(2). 188–196. 45 indexed citations
13.
Prifitera, Aurelio, et al.. (1985). Cautions in interpretation of comparisons between the WAIS--R and the Wechsler Memory Scale.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 53(4). 564–565. 14 indexed citations
14.
Prifitera, Aurelio, et al.. (1985). Cautions in interpretation of comparisons between the WAIS—R and the Wechsler Memory Scale.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 53(4). 564–565. 11 indexed citations
15.
Prifitera, Aurelio & Joseph J. Ryan. (1984). Validity of the narcissistic personality inventory (NPI) in a psychiatric sample. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 40(1). 140–142. 67 indexed citations
16.
Prifitera, Aurelio & Joseph J. Ryan. (1983). WAIS-R/WAIS comparisons in a clinical sample.. 13 indexed citations
17.
Ryan, Joseph J., et al.. (1983). Validity of two- and four-subtest short forms of the WAIS-R in a psychiatric sample.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 51(3). 460–460. 32 indexed citations
18.
Ryan, Joseph J., et al.. (1982). Essential books in clinical neuropsychology.. Professional Psychology. 13(5). 674–676. 2 indexed citations
19.
Ryan, Joseph J. & Aurelio Prifitera. (1982). Concurrent validity of the Luria‐Nebraska memory scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 38(2). 378–379. 6 indexed citations
20.
Prifitera, Aurelio & Joseph J. Ryan. (1981). Validity of the Luria-Nebraska Intellectual Processes Scale as a measure of adult intelligence.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 49(5). 755–756. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026