Mark Pomplun

569 total citations
31 papers, 325 citations indexed

About

Mark Pomplun is a scholar working on Education, Management Science and Operations Research and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Pomplun has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 325 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Education, 14 papers in Management Science and Operations Research and 9 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Mark Pomplun's work include Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (13 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (7 papers) and Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (5 papers). Mark Pomplun is often cited by papers focused on Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (13 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (7 papers) and Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (5 papers). Mark Pomplun collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Mark Pomplun's co-authors include Timothy D. Ritchie, Gale H. Roid, Napoleon Oleka, David Wright, Gerhard Sonnert, James R. Brockmole, L. J. Greenhill and M. H. Schneps and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Educational and Psychological Measurement and Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal.

In The Last Decade

Mark Pomplun

28 papers receiving 240 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Pomplun United States 12 157 88 87 39 36 31 325
Cara Cahalan United States 7 165 1.1× 71 0.8× 33 0.4× 43 1.1× 35 1.0× 11 324
Michal Beller Israel 6 169 1.1× 48 0.5× 34 0.4× 15 0.4× 23 0.6× 12 279
Burak Aydın Türkiye 10 118 0.8× 51 0.6× 25 0.3× 9 0.2× 19 0.5× 40 253
Anne Corinne Huggins United States 8 90 0.6× 116 1.3× 30 0.3× 16 0.4× 9 0.3× 11 346
Olev Must Estonia 11 93 0.6× 68 0.8× 51 0.6× 10 0.3× 8 0.2× 27 352
Kyndra Middleton United States 8 143 0.9× 88 1.0× 48 0.6× 4 0.1× 32 0.9× 20 287
Gloria S. Dion United States 7 232 1.5× 100 1.1× 8 0.1× 10 0.3× 23 0.6× 13 314
Gi‐Pyo Park South Korea 10 199 1.3× 253 2.9× 33 0.4× 18 0.5× 7 0.2× 17 660
Norman M. Chansky United States 10 141 0.9× 87 1.0× 29 0.3× 5 0.1× 16 0.4× 40 302
Karen H. Larwin United States 11 209 1.3× 66 0.8× 6 0.1× 15 0.4× 29 0.8× 55 340

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Pomplun

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Pomplun's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Pomplun with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Pomplun more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Pomplun

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Pomplun. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Pomplun. The network helps show where Mark Pomplun may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Pomplun

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Pomplun. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Pomplun based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Pomplun. Mark Pomplun is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Roid, Gale H. & Mark Pomplun. (2020). SB5: Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, Fifth Edition. edoc (University of Basel). 15 indexed citations
2.
Schneps, M. H., et al.. (2011). Dyslexia Linked to Visual Strengths Useful in Astronomy. 218. 8 indexed citations
3.
Pomplun, Mark. (2007). A Bifactor Analysis for a Mode-of-Administration Effect. Applied Measurement in Education. 20(2). 137–152. 6 indexed citations
4.
Pomplun, Mark, et al.. (2006). Factors in Paper-and-Pencil and Computer Reading Score Differences at the Primary Grades. Educational Assessment. 11(2). 127–143. 19 indexed citations
5.
Pomplun, Mark, et al.. (2005). Does Deferring Items Change Their Psychometric Characteristics?. Applied Measurement in Education. 18(2). 185–197. 1 indexed citations
6.
Pomplun, Mark, et al.. (2005). The Score Comparability of Computerized and Paper-and-Pencil Formats for K-3 Reading Tests. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 32(2). 153–166. 18 indexed citations
7.
Pomplun, Mark, et al.. (2005). The Construct Validity of the Stanford-Binet 5 Measures of Working Memory. Assessment. 12(3). 338–346. 18 indexed citations
8.
Pomplun, Mark, et al.. (2004). A Comparison of Winsteps and Bilog-Mg for Vertical Scaling with the Rasch Model. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 64(4). 600–616. 6 indexed citations
9.
Pomplun, Mark. (2004). The Differential Predictive Validity of the Initial Skills Analysis: Reading Screening Tests for K-3. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 64(5). 813–827. 2 indexed citations
10.
Pomplun, Mark & Timothy D. Ritchie. (2004). An Investigation of Context Effects for Item Randomization within Testlets. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 30(3). 243–254. 11 indexed citations
11.
Pomplun, Mark, et al.. (2003). Do Minority Representative Reading Passages Provide Factorially Invariant Scores for All Students?. Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal. 10(2). 276–288. 5 indexed citations
12.
Pomplun, Mark, et al.. (2001). Score Comparability of a State Reading Assessment Across Selected Groups of Students With Disabilities. Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal. 8(2). 257–274. 2 indexed citations
13.
Pomplun, Mark, et al.. (2001). Do Reading Passages About War Provide Factorially Invariant Scores for Men and Women?. Applied Measurement in Education. 14(2). 171–189. 3 indexed citations
14.
Pomplun, Mark, et al.. (2000). The Validity of a Computerized Measure of Reading Rate. American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting. 2000(1). 4 indexed citations
15.
Pomplun, Mark, et al.. (2000). Score comparability of a state mathematics assessment across students with and without reading accommodations.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 85(1). 21–29. 15 indexed citations
16.
Pomplun, Mark, et al.. (2000). Score comparability of a state mathematics assessment across students with and without reading accommodations.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 85(1). 21–29. 2 indexed citations
17.
Pomplun, Mark, et al.. (1999). Gender Differences in Constructed Response Reading Items. Applied Measurement in Education. 12(1). 95–109. 10 indexed citations
18.
Pomplun, Mark, et al.. (1997). Multiple-Mark Items: An Alternative Objective Item Format?. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 57(6). 949–962. 21 indexed citations
19.
Pomplun, Mark. (1997). State Assessment and Instructional Change: A Path Model Analysis. Applied Measurement in Education. 10(3). 217–234. 11 indexed citations
20.
Pomplun, Mark, et al.. (1992). AN ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH COMPOSITION TEST ESSAY PROMPTS FOR DIFFERENTIAL DIFFICULTY. ETS Research Report Series. 1992(1). 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026