Estefanía Valero‐Cases
- Food Science top 2%
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Oncology
- Biochemistry top 5%
- Co-authors
- María José Frutos FernándezDébora Cerdá-BernadJoaquín Julián Pastor PérezNallely Nuncio‐JáureguiFrancisca Pérez‐LlamasÁngel A. Carbonell‐BarrachinaDante Marco De FaveriArianna Roda
- Topics
- Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (8 papers)Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (7 papers)Probiotics and Fermented Foods (7 papers)
In The Last Decade
Estefanía Valero‐Cases
18 papers receiving 748 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Food Science 435
- Nutrition and Dietetics 331
- Molecular Biology 193
- Oncology 138
- Biochemistry 112
Countries citing papers authored by Estefanía Valero‐Cases
This map shows the geographic impact of Estefanía Valero‐Cases's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Estefanía Valero‐Cases with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Estefanía Valero‐Cases more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Estefanía Valero‐Cases
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Estefanía Valero‐Cases. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Estefanía Valero‐Cases. The network helps show where Estefanía Valero‐Cases may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Estefanía Valero‐Cases
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Estefanía Valero‐Cases. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Estefanía Valero‐Cases based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Estefanía Valero‐Cases. Estefanía Valero‐Cases is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 20 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 27 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 21 | |
| 11 | 124 | |
| 12 | 153 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 42 | |
| 16 | 29 | |
| 17 | 33 | |
| 18 | 112 | |
| 19 | 72 | |
| 20 | 67 |
About Estefanía Valero‐Cases
Estefanía Valero‐Cases is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Nutrition and Dietetics and Food Science, having authored 20 papers that have together received 765 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (8 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (7 papers) and Probiotics and Fermented Foods (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (435 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (331 citations) and Biochemistry (112 citations). Estefanía Valero‐Cases has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Mexico and Italy. Frequent co-authors include María José Frutos Fernández, Débora Cerdá-Bernad, Joaquín Julián Pastor Pérez, Nallely Nuncio‐Jáuregui, Francisca Pérez‐Llamas, Ángel A. Carbonell‐Barrachina, Dante Marco De Faveri, Arianna Roda, Milena Lambri and Roberta Dordoni. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Food Chemistry and Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.