Emma L. Feeney

2.3k citations
57 papers · 1.6k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Emma L. Feeney

52 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Emma L. Feeney
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Sensory Systems 447
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 832
  • Food Science 434
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 441
  • Physiology 248
Replace Hélène Labouré with:
Hélène Labouré France
Chantal Septier France
Eric Neyraud France
Susan Ahlstrom Henderson United States
Camilla Cattaneo Italy
Lisa Newman Australia
Ammar Olabi Lebanon
Paul M. Wise United States
Davide Risso Italy
Kathrin Liszt Austria
Emma L. Feeney relative to Hélène Labouré France Hélène Labouré's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Hélène Labouré · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma L. Feeney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma L. Feeney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma L. Feeney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma L. Feeney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma L. Feeney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma L. Feeney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma L. Feeney. The network helps show where Emma L. Feeney may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma L. Feeney, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma L. Feeney Line = papers co-authored together Emma L. Feeney links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017289
2 2019151
3 2010146
4 2013136
5 202197
6 201875
7 201471
8 201464
9 201557
10 201349
11 201349
12 201535
13 202033
14 201132
15 201726
16 202024
17 201724
18 202223
19 201922
20 202020

About Emma L. Feeney

Emma L. Feeney is a scholar working on Nutrition and Dietetics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sensory Systems, Food Science and Physiology, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (22 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (19 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (18 papers), Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (13 papers), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (9 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (9 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (8 papers) and Fatty Acid Research and Health (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (447 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (832 citations), Food Science (434 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (441 citations) and Physiology (248 citations). Emma L. Feeney has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John E. Hayes, Eileen R. Gibney, S O'brien, Anne Markey, Amalia G. M. Scannell, Alissa A. Nolden, Jeremiah J. Sheehan, Michelle C. McKinley, Prabin Lamichhane and Arne Astrup. Their work appears in journals such as Food Quality and Preference, Proceedings of The Nutrition Society, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, European Journal of Nutrition and International Journal of Dairy Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact