Emma L. Feeney
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 1%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Sensory Systems top 1%
- Food Science top 2%
- Physiology top 10%
- Co-authors
- John E. HayesEileen R. GibneyS O'brienAnne MarkeyAmalia G. M. ScannellJeremiah J. SheehanPrabin LamichhaneAlissa A. Nolden
- Topics
- Nutritional Studies and Diet (21 papers)Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (20 papers)Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (16 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaAmerican Journal of Clinical NutritionBMJ
- Partner nations
- IrelandUnited StatesDenmark
In The Last Decade
Emma L. Feeney
47 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Nutrition and Dietetics 819
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 467
- Sensory Systems 430
- Food Science 395
- Physiology 305
Countries citing papers authored by Emma L. Feeney
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma L. Feeney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma L. Feeney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma L. Feeney more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma L. Feeney
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma L. Feeney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma L. Feeney. The network helps show where Emma L. Feeney may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma L. Feeney
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma L. Feeney. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma L. Feeney based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma L. Feeney. Emma L. Feeney is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 141 | |
| 17 | 24 | |
| 18 | 13 | |
| 19 | 31 | |
| 20 | 67 |
About Emma L. Feeney
Emma L. Feeney is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Nutrition and Dietetics and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nutritional Studies and Diet (21 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (20 papers) and Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (430 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (819 citations) and Food Science (395 citations). Emma L. Feeney has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include John E. Hayes, Eileen R. Gibney, S O'brien, Anne Markey, Amalia G. M. Scannell, Jeremiah J. Sheehan, Prabin Lamichhane, Alissa A. Nolden, Arne Astrup and Sabita S. Soedamah‐Muthu. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition and BMJ.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.