Emily Dexter
- Education top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Artificial Intelligence
- Co-authors
- Joanne L. MillerAnthony S. BrykGina BiancarosaSarah LevinePatricia VelascoDavid KerbowIrene C. FountasHeather J. Hough
- Topics
- Parental Involvement in Education (3 papers)Reading and Literacy Development (2 papers)Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Experimental and Cognitive PsychologyLinguistics and LanguageDevelopmental and Educational Psychology
- Journals
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaJournal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & PerformanceThe Elementary School Journal
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Emily Dexter
7 papers receiving 337 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Education 174
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 142
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 121
- Cognitive Neuroscience 70
- Artificial Intelligence 53
Countries citing papers authored by Emily Dexter
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Dexter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Dexter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Dexter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Dexter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Dexter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Dexter. The network helps show where Emily Dexter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Dexter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Dexter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Dexter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Dexter. Emily Dexter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 166 | |
| 3 | The Black-White Achievement Gap Amongst Struggling Readers: A Case Study of Early Intervention Outcomes in Massachusetts | 1 |
| 4 | 30 | |
| 5 | Maternal literacy and health care in three countries: a preliminary report. | 28 |
| 6 | 86 | |
| 7 | 56 | |
| 8 | 10 |
About Emily Dexter
Emily Dexter is a scholar working on Safety Research, Linguistics and Language and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 386 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parental Involvement in Education (3 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (2 papers) and Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (142 citations), Linguistics and Language (45 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (121 citations). Emily Dexter has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Joanne L. Miller, Anthony S. Bryk, Gina Biancarosa, Sarah Levine, Patricia Velasco, David Kerbow, Irene C. Fountas, Heather J. Hough and Gay Su Pinnell. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance and The Elementary School Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.