Eli Tucker‐Raymond

841 total citations
35 papers, 564 citations indexed

About

Eli Tucker‐Raymond is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Eli Tucker‐Raymond has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 564 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Computer Science Applications, 16 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 14 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Eli Tucker‐Raymond's work include Teaching and Learning Programming (20 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (11 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (9 papers). Eli Tucker‐Raymond is often cited by papers focused on Teaching and Learning Programming (20 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (11 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (9 papers). Eli Tucker‐Raymond collaborates with scholars based in United States, Spain and India. Eli Tucker‐Raymond's co-authors include Gillian Puttick, Ann S. Rosebery, Beth Warren, María Varelas, Brian Gravel, Michael Cassidy, Christine C. Pappas, Casper Harteveld, Giovanni Maria Troiano and Aditi Wagh and has published in prestigious journals such as Computers & Education, Journal of Research in Science Teaching and Science Education.

In The Last Decade

Eli Tucker‐Raymond

33 papers receiving 525 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Eli Tucker‐Raymond United States 13 286 257 181 82 47 35 564
Flávio S. Azevedo United States 11 347 1.2× 198 0.8× 72 0.4× 123 1.5× 42 0.9× 23 633
Katie Van Horne United States 12 281 1.0× 139 0.5× 58 0.3× 50 0.6× 20 0.4× 25 455
Rena Dorph United States 8 387 1.4× 248 1.0× 85 0.5× 50 0.6× 25 0.5× 15 597
Eve Manz United States 12 811 2.8× 622 2.4× 78 0.4× 85 1.0× 38 0.8× 21 987
Danielle Herro United States 14 357 1.2× 132 0.5× 139 0.8× 47 0.6× 19 0.4× 39 643
Nichole Pinkard United States 13 416 1.5× 168 0.7× 278 1.5× 123 1.5× 48 1.0× 50 736
Aik‐Ling Tan Singapore 19 688 2.4× 326 1.3× 72 0.4× 71 0.9× 32 0.7× 71 932
Leah A. Bricker United States 8 400 1.4× 270 1.1× 25 0.1× 81 1.0× 30 0.6× 16 524
Meg Escudé United States 7 180 0.6× 75 0.3× 146 0.8× 78 1.0× 52 1.1× 8 454
Tamara Holmlund Nelson United States 17 764 2.7× 276 1.1× 65 0.4× 65 0.8× 17 0.4× 26 959

Countries citing papers authored by Eli Tucker‐Raymond

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eli Tucker‐Raymond's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eli Tucker‐Raymond with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eli Tucker‐Raymond more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eli Tucker‐Raymond

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eli Tucker‐Raymond. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eli Tucker‐Raymond. The network helps show where Eli Tucker‐Raymond may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eli Tucker‐Raymond

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eli Tucker‐Raymond. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eli Tucker‐Raymond based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eli Tucker‐Raymond. Eli Tucker‐Raymond is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gravel, Brian, Joshua Cohen, Christopher Wright, et al.. (2024). Empowering Students in Learning Engineering and Design: Ethical and Transformative Pedagogy for a Socially Conscious Future. Proceedings.. 2029–2036. 1 indexed citations
2.
Wright, Christopher, et al.. (2024). Racialized spatial imaginaries: Authoring an elementary school teacher of engineering identity. Science Education. 109(1). 157–177. 2 indexed citations
3.
Puttick, Gillian, Michael Cassidy, Eli Tucker‐Raymond, Giovanni Maria Troiano, & Casper Harteveld. (2023). “So, we kind of started from scratch, no pun intended”: What can students learn from designing games?. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 61(4). 772–808. 5 indexed citations
4.
Tucker‐Raymond, Eli, et al.. (2023). Near Peer Pedagogies for Culturally Sustaining Computer Science and Mathematics. 1 indexed citations
5.
Gravel, Brian, et al.. (2022). “Weebles wobble but they also commit to lifelong relationships”: teachers’ transdisciplinary learning in computational play. International Journal of STEM Education. 9(1). 7 indexed citations
6.
Gravel, Brian, et al.. (2021). More than Mechanisms: Shifting Ideologies for Asset-Based Learning in Engineering Education. Purdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System). 11(1). 16 indexed citations
7.
Watkins, Jessica, Brian Gravel, Eli Tucker‐Raymond, et al.. (2020). Centering Relationships in STEM Disciplines: A Sociopolitical Lens on Teacher Learning.. ICLS. 1 indexed citations
8.
Troiano, Giovanni Maria, et al.. (2020). All Good Things Come in Threes: Assessing Student-Designed Games via Triadic Game Design. 1–4. 8 indexed citations
9.
Hall, Rogers, Brian Gravel, Eli Tucker‐Raymond, et al.. (2020). Designs for Learning With and Through Sound.. 453–460. 1 indexed citations
10.
Troiano, Giovanni Maria, Qinyu Chen, Gregório Robles, et al.. (2020). Exploring How Game Genre in Student-Designed Games Influences Computational Thinking Development. 1–17. 23 indexed citations
11.
Tucker‐Raymond, Eli, et al.. (2020). (Designing for) learning computational STEM and arts integration in culturally sustaining learning ecologies. Information and Learning Sciences. 121(9/10). 785–804. 6 indexed citations
12.
Tucker‐Raymond, Eli & Brian Gravel. (2019). STEM Literacies in Makerspaces. 19 indexed citations
13.
Puttick, Gillian & Eli Tucker‐Raymond. (2018). Building Systems from Scratch: an Exploratory Study of Students Learning About Climate Change. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 27(4). 306–321. 35 indexed citations
14.
Gravel, Brian, et al.. (2017). Navigating worlds of information: STEM literacy practices of experienced makers. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. 28(4). 921–938. 11 indexed citations
15.
Tucker‐Raymond, Eli, et al.. (2016). Opting in and Creating Demand: Why Young People Choose to Teach Mathematics to Each Other. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 25(6). 1025–1041. 12 indexed citations
16.
Tucker‐Raymond, Eli, et al.. (2016). DiaspoRican Art as a Space for Identity Building, Cultural Reclamation, and Political Reimagining. Journal of Latinos and Education. 16(3). 217–228. 5 indexed citations
17.
Tucker‐Raymond, Eli, et al.. (2016). Source Code and a Screwdriver: STEM Literacy Practices in Fabricating Activities Among Experienced Adult Makers. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy. 60(6). 617–627. 7 indexed citations
18.
Tucker‐Raymond, Eli, et al.. (2014). Imagining Identities. Urban Education. 52(1). 32–60. 5 indexed citations
19.
Tucker‐Raymond, Eli, et al.. (2011). Cultural Persistence, Political Resistance, and Hope in the Community and School-Based Art of a Puerto Rican Diaspora Neighborhood. Equity & Excellence in Education. 44(2). 270–286. 9 indexed citations
20.
Tucker‐Raymond, Eli, et al.. (2006). “They probably aren’t named Rachel”: Young children’s scientist identities as emergent multimodal narratives. Cultural Studies of Science Education. 1(3). 559–592. 35 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026