Ann S. Rosebery

3.2k total citations · 2 hit papers
33 papers, 1.9k citations indexed

About

Ann S. Rosebery is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Ann S. Rosebery has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 1.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Education, 15 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Ann S. Rosebery's work include Science Education and Pedagogy (9 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (8 papers) and Student Assessment and Feedback (5 papers). Ann S. Rosebery is often cited by papers focused on Science Education and Pedagogy (9 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (8 papers) and Student Assessment and Feedback (5 papers). Ann S. Rosebery collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Ann S. Rosebery's co-authors include Beth Warren, Cynthia Ballenger, Douglas L. Medin, Megan Bang, Norma González, Ellen McIntyre, Eli Tucker‐Raymond, Gillian Puttick, John R. Frederiksen and Mary Catherine O’Connor and has published in prestigious journals such as American Educational Research Journal, Journal of Research in Science Teaching and Science Education.

In The Last Decade

Ann S. Rosebery

32 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Hit Papers

Appropriating Scientific Discourse: Findings From Languag... 1992 2026 2003 2014 1992 2012 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ann S. Rosebery United States 13 1.4k 831 308 214 193 33 1.9k
Beth Warren United States 13 1.3k 0.9× 805 1.0× 275 0.9× 205 1.0× 178 0.9× 30 1.8k
Bryan A. Brown United States 15 973 0.7× 502 0.6× 239 0.8× 223 1.0× 130 0.7× 34 1.4k
Walter G. Secada United States 21 1.3k 0.9× 435 0.5× 237 0.8× 163 0.8× 96 0.5× 61 1.7k
Sheila W. Valencia United States 20 1.6k 1.1× 780 0.9× 293 1.0× 230 1.1× 54 0.3× 55 2.0k
Pamela L. Grossman United States 19 2.3k 1.6× 465 0.6× 578 1.9× 276 1.3× 156 0.8× 33 2.6k
Cory Buxton United States 20 873 0.6× 333 0.4× 147 0.5× 198 0.9× 205 1.1× 69 1.2k
María Varelas United States 21 966 0.7× 465 0.6× 210 0.7× 176 0.8× 122 0.6× 49 1.2k
Magdalene Lampert United States 18 3.2k 2.2× 1000 1.2× 545 1.8× 161 0.8× 112 0.6× 34 3.7k
Karen Hammerness United States 23 2.4k 1.7× 465 0.6× 602 2.0× 143 0.7× 149 0.8× 60 2.8k
James V. Hoffman United States 27 1.8k 1.2× 1.2k 1.5× 272 0.9× 394 1.8× 46 0.2× 116 2.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Ann S. Rosebery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ann S. Rosebery's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann S. Rosebery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann S. Rosebery more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ann S. Rosebery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann S. Rosebery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann S. Rosebery. The network helps show where Ann S. Rosebery may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ann S. Rosebery

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ann S. Rosebery. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ann S. Rosebery based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ann S. Rosebery. Ann S. Rosebery is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Sireci, Stephen G., et al.. (2020). Targeted Linguistic Simplification of Science Test Items for English Learners. American Educational Research Journal. 57(5). 2175–2209. 9 indexed citations
3.
Rosebery, Ann S., Beth Warren, & Eli Tucker‐Raymond. (2015). Developing interpretive power in science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 53(10). 1571–1600. 114 indexed citations
4.
Kachchaf, Rachel, et al.. (2014). Do Linguistic Features of Science Test Items Prevent English Language Learners from Demonstrating Their Knowledge. Grantee Submission. 1 indexed citations
5.
Kachchaf, Rachel, et al.. (2014). The Impact of Discourse Features of Science Test Items on ELL Performance.. Grantee Submission. 1 indexed citations
6.
Rosebery, Ann S., et al.. (2012). “I never thought of it as freezing”: How students answer questions on large‐scale science tests and what they know about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 49(6). 778–803. 40 indexed citations
7.
Warren, Beth & Ann S. Rosebery. (2011). Navigating Interculturality: African American Male Students and the Science Classroom. 2(1). 98–115. 47 indexed citations
8.
Ballenger, Cynthia & Ann S. Rosebery. (2003). What Counts as Teacher Research? Investigating the Scientific and Mathematical Ideas of Children from Culturally Diverse Backgrounds. Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education. 105(2). 297–314. 12 indexed citations
9.
Rosebery, Ann S. & Beth Warren. (2001). Understanding Diversity in Science and Mathematics.. Hand. 24(2). 6. 1 indexed citations
10.
McIntyre, Ellen, Ann S. Rosebery, & Norma González. (2001). Classroom Diversity: Connecting Curriculum to Students' Lives.. 118 indexed citations
11.
Rosebery, Ann S. & Beth Warren. (2000). Professional Development and Children's Understanding of Force and Motion: Assessment Results.. 2 indexed citations
12.
Rosebery, Ann S. & Gillian Puttick. (1998). Teacher professional development as situated sense-making: A case study in science education. Science Education. 82(6). 649–677. 50 indexed citations
13.
Warren, Beth & Ann S. Rosebery. (1993). Equity in the Future Tense: Redefining Relationships among Teachers, Students, and Science in Linguistic Minority Classrooms. Working Paper 1-93.. 2 indexed citations
14.
Rosebery, Ann S., et al.. (1992). Appropriating Scientific Discourse: Findings From Language Minority Classrooms. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 2(1). 61–94. 377 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Warren, Beth & Ann S. Rosebery. (1991). Cheche Konnen: Collaborative Scientific Inquiry in Language Minority Classrooms. Handbook for Teachers and Planners from the Innovative Approaches Research Project. Second Edition.. 2 indexed citations
16.
Rosebery, Ann S. & Andee Rubin. (1990). Teaching Statistical Reasoning with Computers. Teaching Statistics. 12(2). 38–42. 3 indexed citations
17.
Warren, Beth & Ann S. Rosebery. (1988). Theory and Practice. Remedial and Special Education. 9(2). 29–38. 7 indexed citations
18.
Rosebery, Ann S.. (1985). Semantic and Syntactic Bases of Text Comprehension.. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC). 3 indexed citations
19.
Frederiksen, John R., Beth Warren, & Ann S. Rosebery. (1985). A Componential Approach to Training Reading Skills: Part 2. Decoding and Use of Context. Cognition and Instruction. 2(3-4). 271–338. 26 indexed citations
20.
Frederiksen, John R., Beth Warren, & Ann S. Rosebery. (1985). A Componential Approach to Training Reading Skills: Part 2. Decoding and Use of Context. Ethics & Behavior. 2(3). 271–338. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026