Dail Fields

4.3k citations
47 papers · 2.9k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 23

Dail Fields

46 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Hit Papers

Trust and tacit knowledge sharing and use5332010202620152020100200300400500

Peers

Dail Fields
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 1.4k
  • Communication 507
  • Gender Studies 551
  • Public Administration 113
  • Strategy and Management 475
Replace Paul L. Koopman with:
Paul L. Koopman Netherlands
Mark B. Gavin United States
Christine M. Riordan United States
Suzanne S. Masterson United States
Michael Riketta Germany
Carl P. Maertz United States
Donald B. Fedor United States
Jeremy B. Bernerth United States
James A. Breaugh United States
Patrick C. Flood Ireland
Dail Fields relative to Paul L. Koopman Netherlands Paul L. Koopman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Paul L. Koopman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dail Fields

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dail Fields's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dail Fields with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dail Fields more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dail Fields

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dail Fields. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dail Fields. The network helps show where Dail Fields may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Dail Fields, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dail Fields Line = papers co-authored together Dail Fields links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202019
2 20164
3 201642
4 20151
5 20158
6 201561
7 201536
8 20144
9 20111
10 201133
11 201019
12
Trust and tacit knowledge sharing and usebreakdown →
2010533
13 200767
14 200530
15 200525
16 200427
17 2003128
18
An examination of computer-use ethics in Hong Kong and the United States
19982
19 19981
20 19693

About Dail Fields

Dail Fields is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Public Administration, Gender Studies, Demography and Communication, having authored 47 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (18 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (10 papers), Workplace Spirituality and Leadership (7 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (6 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (5 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (4 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (3 papers) and Knowledge Management and Sharing (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (1.4k citations), Communication (507 citations), Gender Studies (551 citations), Public Administration (113 citations) and Strategy and Management (475 citations). Dail Fields has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hong Kong and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Terry C. Blum, Jodi S. Goodman, Samuel Aryee, Vivienne Luk, Catherine Chiu, Mary Pang, Syed Akhtar, David M. Herold, Paul M. Roman and Bruce E. Winston. Their work appears in journals such as Health Services Research, Academy of Management Journal, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Leadership and The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026