Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Cynthia Webster
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Cynthia Webster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cynthia Webster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cynthia Webster more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cynthia Webster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cynthia Webster. The network helps show where Cynthia Webster may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cynthia Webster
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cynthia Webster.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cynthia Webster based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Cynthia Webster. Cynthia Webster is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
D’Alessandro, Steven, Leanne Carter, & Cynthia Webster. (2022). Binge drinking: A review and research agenda. Journal of Consumer Behaviour. 22(1). 177–198.10 indexed citations
Webster, Cynthia, Jasmina Ilicic, & Marie‐Louise Fry. (2008). Attitudes, purchase intention and consumer-human brand attachment. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland).1 indexed citations
Sundaram, D.S. & Cynthia Webster. (1999). The Role of Brand Familiarity on the Impact of Word-Of-Mouth Communication on Brand Evaluations. ACR North American Advances.80 indexed citations
10.
Webster, Cynthia & Linda Wright. (1999). The Effects of Strength of Family Relationship on Intergenerational Influence. ACR North American Advances.11 indexed citations
Webster, Cynthia. (1998). The Meaning and Measurement of Marital Power: a Review. ACR North American Advances.4 indexed citations
14.
Young, Alexander S., Oscar Grusky, Greer Sullivan, Cynthia Webster, & Deborah Podus. (1998). The Effect of Provider Characteristics on Case Management Activities. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. 26(1). 21–32.22 indexed citations
15.
Webster, Cynthia & Robert C. Beatty. (1997). Nationality, Materialism, and Possession Importance. ACR North American Advances.19 indexed citations
16.
Reiss, Michelle C. & Cynthia Webster. (1997). Relative Influence in Purchase Decision Making: Married, Cohabitating, and Homosexual Couples. ACR North American Advances.2 indexed citations
17.
Webster, Cynthia, et al.. (1996). Equity Theory and the Power Structure in a Marital Relationship. ACR North American Advances.7 indexed citations
18.
Webster, Cynthia & James B. Faircloth. (1994). The Role of Hispanic Ethnic Identification on Reference Group Influence. ACR North American Advances. 21(1). 458–463.7 indexed citations
Webster, Cynthia & David Ogilvy. (1986). Ogilvy on Advertising. Journal of Marketing. 50(4). 255–255.194 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.