Word-Of-Mouth Communications: a Motivational Analysis
- Journal
- ACR North American Advances
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w3796526 →Countries where authors are citing Word-Of-Mouth Communications: a Motivational Analysis
This map shows the geographic impact of Word-Of-Mouth Communications: a Motivational Analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Word-Of-Mouth Communications: a Motivational Analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Word-Of-Mouth Communications: a Motivational Analysis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Word-Of-Mouth Communications: a Motivational Analysis
This network shows the impact of Word-Of-Mouth Communications: a Motivational Analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Word-Of-Mouth Communications: a Motivational Analysis.
About Word-Of-Mouth Communications: a Motivational Analysis
This paper, published in 1998, received 583 indexed citations . Written by D.S. Sundaram, Kaushik Mitra and Cynthia Webster. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (493 citations), Marketing (313 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (211 citations). Published in ACR North American Advances.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w3796526.