Craig C. Pinder

29 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Hit Papers

Work Motivation Theory and Research at the Dawn of the Tw...20042026201120182004250500750

Peers

Craig C. Pinder
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 1.2k
  • Social Psychology 541
  • Sociology and Political Science 460
  • Demography 364
  • Strategy and Management 308
Replace Dov Elizur with:
Dov Elizur Israel
Betty Velthouse United States
J. Stacy Adams United States
Robert W. Kolodinsky United States
Lee G. Bolman United States
Jeanette N. Cleveland United States
George W. England United States
Barbara A. Gutek United States
James C. Sarros Australia
John E. Barbuto United States
Craig C. Pinder relative to Dov Elizur Israel Dov Elizur's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Dov Elizur · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Craig C. Pinder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Craig C. Pinder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Craig C. Pinder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Craig C. Pinder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Craig C. Pinder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Craig C. Pinder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Craig C. Pinder. The network helps show where Craig C. Pinder may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Craig C. Pinder

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Craig C. Pinder. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Craig C. Pinder based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Craig C. Pinder. Craig C. Pinder is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 275
2 287
3
Work motivation in organizational behavior, 2nd ed.
61
4 1
5 0
6 27
7 123
8 12
9 164
10 30
11 49
12 134
13 6
14 97
15 2
16 38
17 6
18
Behavioral Style and Personal Characteristics of Managers.
3
19 13
20
Gnosiology: The Scientific Approach to the Theory of Knowledge
27

About Craig C. Pinder

Craig C. Pinder is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Applied Psychology and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 32 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (6 papers), Psychology of Social Influence (3 papers) and Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (1.2k citations), Applied Psychology (189 citations) and Communication (216 citations). Craig C. Pinder has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Gary P. Latham, A. R. Elangovan, Murdith McLean, Larry F. Moore, Sandy J. Wayne, Ricky W. Griffin, Richard W. Stackman, David L. Rogers, George W. England and Gordon A. Walter. Their work appears in journals such as Academy of Management Review, Academy of Management Journal and Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026