Claudia de Witt
- Education top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Computer Science Applications top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Information Systems
- Co-authors
- Michael KerresNiels PinkwartXia WangBardo HerzigTheo HugGerhard TulodzieckiBen BachmairRudolf Kammerl
- Topics
- Education Methods and Technologies (14 papers)Sociology and Education Studies (12 papers)Linguistic Education and Pedagogy (7 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaZeitschrift für PädagogikUnterrichtswissenschaft
In The Last Decade
Claudia de Witt
21 papers receiving 221 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Education 199
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 80
- Computer Science Applications 62
- Sociology and Political Science 49
- Information Systems 44
Countries citing papers authored by Claudia de Witt
This map shows the geographic impact of Claudia de Witt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Claudia de Witt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Claudia de Witt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Claudia de Witt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Claudia de Witt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Claudia de Witt. The network helps show where Claudia de Witt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Claudia de Witt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Claudia de Witt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Claudia de Witt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Claudia de Witt. Claudia de Witt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | Mobile Learning – von den Erwartungen in 2005 zur Realität in 2015: Eine vergleichendeUntersuchung zu Mobile Learning in Unternehmen | 1 |
| 9 | New forms of learning for vocational education: mobile learning - social learning - game-based learning | 4 |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | Mediendidaktik. 2., aktualisierte und überarbeitete Auflage | 1 |
| 12 | Neue Lernformen für die berufliche Bildung: Mobile Learning - Social Learning - Game Based Learning | 2 |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 195 | |
| 17 | 17 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Claudia de Witt
Claudia de Witt is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Computer Science Applications and Education, having authored 23 papers that have together received 284 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Education Methods and Technologies (14 papers), Sociology and Education Studies (12 papers) and Linguistic Education and Pedagogy (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (62 citations), Education (199 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (80 citations). Claudia de Witt has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Michael Kerres, Niels Pinkwart, Xia Wang, Bardo Herzig, Theo Hug, Gerhard Tulodziecki, Ben Bachmair and Rudolf Kammerl. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Zeitschrift für Pädagogik and Unterrichtswissenschaft.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.