Zeitschrift für Pädagogik

1.7k papers and 6.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.7k papers published in Zeitschrift für Pädagogik in the last decades have received a total of 6.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Zeitschrift für Pädagogik usually cover Sociology and Political Science (1.2k papers), Education (1.1k papers) and Language and Linguistics (352 papers) specifically the topics of Sociology and Education Studies (1.1k papers), Education Methods and Technologies (775 papers) and Linguistic Education and Pedagogy (349 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Zeitschrift für Pädagogik are Ewald Terhart, Heinz‐Elmar Tenorth, Eckhard Klieme, Thomas Koinzer, Johannes Fromme, Andreas Krapp, Richard M. Ryan, Edward L. Deci, Dietrich Benner and Werner Helsper.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Zeitschrift für Pädagogik

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Zeitschrift für Pädagogik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Zeitschrift für Pädagogik.

Countries where authors publish in Zeitschrift für Pädagogik

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Zeitschrift für Pädagogik. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Zeitschrift für Pädagogik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zeitschrift für Pädagogik more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025