Christopher Sterling

16 papers receiving 315 citations

Peers

Christopher Sterling
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 177
  • Statistics and Probability 38
  • Education 129
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 9
  • Safety Research 32
Replace Robert Ayres with:
Robert Ayres United States
Vicky G. Spencer United States
Maureen Ehrensberger‐Dow Switzerland
Kelley Regan United States
Vibeke Grøver Aukrust Norway
Karen H. Larwin United States
Stijn Smeets Belgium
Riitta Kinnunen Finland
Edward L. Meyen United States
Sara M. Fulmer United States
Christopher Sterling relative to Robert Ayres United States Robert Ayres's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Robert Ayres · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Sterling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Sterling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Sterling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Sterling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Sterling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Sterling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Sterling. The network helps show where Christopher Sterling may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Sterling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher Sterling Line = papers co-authored together Christopher Sterling links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 1999121
2 200940
3 199837
4 198336
5 198221
6 201518
7 201515
8 201612
9 201710
10 202210
11
A TALE OF TWO ENVYS: A SOCIAL NETWORK PERSPECTIVE ON THE CONSEQUENCES OF WORKPLACE SOCIAL COMPARISON
20139
12 20135
13 20234
14 20174
15 20232
16 20102
17 20201
18 19970

About Christopher Sterling

Christopher Sterling is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Education and Communication, having authored 18 papers that have together received 347 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (5 papers), Cognitive Functions and Memory (4 papers), Writing and Handwriting Education (3 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (3 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (3 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (3 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (3 papers) and Early Childhood Education and Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (177 citations), Statistics and Probability (38 citations), Education (129 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (9 citations) and Safety Research (32 citations). Christopher Sterling has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Marion Farmer, Barbara Riddick, Steven F. Morgan, James H. Smith‐Spark, Philip T. Smith, Giuseppe Labianca, Travis Grosser, Theresa M. Floyd, Kristin L. Cullen and Henry Moon. Their work appears in journals such as Dyslexia, Research in Developmental Disabilities, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Industrial and Organizational Psychology and International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact