Philip T. Smith
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Co-authors
- Robin N. CampbellJanet CockburnGeorgina HughesKate BennettR. BakerJudy TurnerLucy A. HenryDerick T Wade
- Topics
- Reading and Literacy Development (10 papers)Phonetics and Phonology Research (5 papers)Memory Processes and Influences (5 papers)
- Cited by
- Developmental and Educational PsychologyGeneral Decision SciencesExperimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Philip T. Smith
42 papers receiving 627 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 271
- Cognitive Neuroscience 212
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 180
- Clinical Psychology 107
- Psychiatry and Mental health 70
Countries citing papers authored by Philip T. Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip T. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip T. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip T. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip T. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip T. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip T. Smith. The network helps show where Philip T. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip T. Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip T. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip T. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip T. Smith. Philip T. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | When Does Ignorance Make Us Smart? Additional Factors Guiding Heuristic Inference | 3 |
| 4 | 34 | |
| 5 | 20 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 27 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 20 | |
| 10 | 49 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 39 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | In Defence of Conservatism in English Orthography. | 1 |
| 18 | Language development and mother-child interaction | 1 |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Philip T. Smith
Philip T. Smith is a scholar working on Computational Mathematics, General Decision Sciences and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 45 papers that have together received 680 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (10 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (5 papers) and Memory Processes and Influences (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (271 citations), General Decision Sciences (28 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (180 citations). Philip T. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Robin N. Campbell, Janet Cockburn, Georgina Hughes, Kate Bennett, R. Baker, Judy Turner, Lucy A. Henry, Derick T Wade, Christopher Sterling and C. Philip Beaman. Their work appears in journals such as Memory & Cognition, Cognitive Science and British Journal of Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.