Philip T. Smith

965 total citations
45 papers, 680 citations indexed

About

Philip T. Smith is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip T. Smith has authored 45 papers receiving a total of 680 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 13 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 10 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Philip T. Smith's work include Reading and Literacy Development (10 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (5 papers) and Memory Processes and Influences (5 papers). Philip T. Smith is often cited by papers focused on Reading and Literacy Development (10 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (5 papers) and Memory Processes and Influences (5 papers). Philip T. Smith collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Philip T. Smith's co-authors include Robin N. Campbell, Janet Cockburn, Georgina Hughes, Kate Bennett, R. Baker, Judy Turner, Lucy A. Henry, Derick T Wade, Christopher Sterling and C. Philip Beaman and has published in prestigious journals such as Memory & Cognition, Cognitive Science and British Journal of Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Philip T. Smith

42 papers receiving 627 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Philip T. Smith United Kingdom	14	271	212	180	107	70	45	680
Susan C. Somerville United States	17	429 1.6×	236 1.1×	190 1.1×	53 0.5×	79 1.1×	31	867
Jei-Tun Wu Taiwan	10	177 0.7×	156 0.7×	89 0.5×	57 0.5×	28 0.4×	21	426
Eva Rosa Spain	13	471 1.7×	495 2.3×	184 1.0×	66 0.6×	25 0.4×	41	817
Mary J. Naus United States	17	436 1.6×	390 1.8×	229 1.3×	117 1.1×	50 0.7×	33	979
Duncan McArthur United States	7	194 0.7×	223 1.1×	63 0.3×	154 1.4×	39 0.6×	10	539
William Strein United States	9	536 2.0×	131 0.6×	145 0.8×	254 2.4×	78 1.1×	32	955
Sendy Caffarra Spain	17	336 1.2×	416 2.0×	218 1.2×	202 1.9×	12 0.2×	40	806
Claudine Bowyer‐Crane United Kingdom	18	1.4k 5.0×	340 1.6×	105 0.6×	133 1.2×	71 1.0×	27	1.6k
Joanna S. Worthley United States	6	339 1.3×	557 2.6×	174 1.0×	26 0.2×	147 2.1×	6	852
Soo Rim Noh United States	13	208 0.8×	286 1.3×	205 1.1×	45 0.4×	76 1.1×	30	593

Countries citing papers authored by Philip T. Smith

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip T. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip T. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip T. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip T. Smith

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip T. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip T. Smith. The network helps show where Philip T. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip T. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip T. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip T. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip T. Smith. Philip T. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Beaman, C. Philip, Philip T. Smith, Caren A. Frosch, & Rachel McCloy. (2010). Less-is-more effects without the recognition heuristic. Judgment and Decision Making. 5(4). 258–271. 12 indexed citations

Smith, Philip T.. (2009). Ranald Macdonald and statistical inference. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 62(2). 195–199.

Beaman, C. Philip, Rachel McCloy, & Philip T. Smith. (2006). When Does Ignorance Make Us Smart? Additional Factors Guiding Heuristic Inference. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 3 indexed citations

Bennett, Kate, Georgina Hughes, & Philip T. Smith. (2005). Psychological Response to Later Life Widowhood: Coping and the Effects of Gender. OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying. 51(1). 33–52. 34 indexed citations

Turner, Judy, et al.. (2004). Redintegration and lexicality effects in children: Do they depend upon the demands of the memory task?. Memory & Cognition. 32(3). 501–510. 20 indexed citations

Smith, Philip T., et al.. (2001). Structural equation modelling of human judgement. Thinking & Reasoning. 7(1). 51–68. 5 indexed citations

Henry, Lucy A., et al.. (2000). Modality Effects and the Development of the Word Length Effect in Children. Memory. 8(1). 1–17. 27 indexed citations

Smith, Philip T.. (2000). A jigsaw puzzle theory of memory. Memory. 8(4). 245–264. 12 indexed citations

Cockburn, Janet, et al.. (1995). A subjective memory assessment questionnaire for use with elderly people after stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation. 9(3). 238–244. 20 indexed citations

10.

Cockburn, Janet & Philip T. Smith. (1994). Anxiety and errors of prospective memory among elderly people. British Journal of Psychology. 85(2). 273–282. 49 indexed citations

11.

Smith, Philip T.. (1994). Measuring visual neglect. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 4(2). 203–206. 1 indexed citations

12.

Cockburn, Janet & Philip T. Smith. (1993). Correlates of everyday memory among residents of Part III homes. British Journal of Clinical Psychology. 32(1). 75–77. 8 indexed citations

13.

Cockburn, Janet, Philip T. Smith, & Derick T Wade. (1990). Influence of cognitive function on social, domestic, and leisure activities of community-dwelling older people. International Disability Studies. 12(4). 169–172. 39 indexed citations

14.

Smith, Philip T.. (1989). Critical Notice: Deadly Tenacity and Almost Diabolical Cunning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A. 41(4). 877–884. 3 indexed citations

15.

Macdonald, Ranald R. & Philip T. Smith. (1983). Testing for differences between means with ordered hypotheses. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 36(1). 22–35. 2 indexed citations

16.

Ramachandran, V., Philip T. Smith, D. M. MACKAY, et al.. (1982). Review: Cerebral Correlates of Conscious Experience, Cognitive Psychology and its Implications, Sensation and Perception: An Integrated Approach, Preconscious Processing, Introduction to Multidimensional Scaling; Theory, Methods and Applications, the Psychological Study of Object Perception: Examination of Methodological Problems and a Critique of Main Research Approaches. Perception. 11(3). 363–370. 2 indexed citations

17.

Smith, Philip T.. (1980). In Defence of Conservatism in English Orthography.. Visible Language. 14(2). 1 indexed citations

18.

Campbell, Robin N. & Philip T. Smith. (1978). Language development and mother-child interaction. Plenum Press eBooks. 1 indexed citations

19.

Smith, Philip T., et al.. (1975). SOME HIERARCHICAL SCALING METHODS FOR CONFUSION MATRIX ANALYSIS. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 28(1). 1–29. 2 indexed citations

20.

Smith, Philip T.. (1970). Decision processes in long-term memory. Acta Psychologica. 33. 315–325. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact