British Journal of Psychology

3.0k papers and 117.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.0k papers published in British Journal of Psychology in the last decades have received a total of 117.3k indexed citations. Papers published in British Journal of Psychology usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (1.2k papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (769 papers) and Social Psychology (655 papers) specifically the topics of Memory Processes and Influences (211 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (207 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (200 papers). The most active scholars publishing in British Journal of Psychology are Marian Annett, Vicki Bruce, Andrew W. Young, Rupert Conrad, David F Marks, Thom Baguley, Alan Baddeley, Rich S.W. Masters, Tim Valentine and Philip H. K. Seymour.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in British Journal of Psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in British Journal of Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in British Journal of Psychology.

Countries where authors publish in British Journal of Psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in British Journal of Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in British Journal of Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites British Journal of Psychology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025