Chang‐Wei Hsieh

4.4k citations
182 papers · 3.4k · h-index 35

Impact in

Papers in

Chang‐Wei Hsieh

174 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Peers

Chang‐Wei Hsieh
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
  • Biotechnology 504
  • Biochemistry 313
  • Food Science 890
  • Animal Science and Zoology 386
  • Biomaterials 433
Replace Yun Deng with:
Yun Deng China
Prem Prakash Srivastav India
Muhammad Faisal Manzoor China
Min Wang China
Mohamed Ghoul France
Shahin Roohinejad Iran
Zhenzhou Zhu China
Byung‐Soo Chun South Korea
Mohsen Gavahian Taiwan
Chang‐Wei Hsieh relative to Yun Deng China Yun Deng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Yun Deng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chang‐Wei Hsieh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chang‐Wei Hsieh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chang‐Wei Hsieh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chang‐Wei Hsieh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chang‐Wei Hsieh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chang‐Wei Hsieh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chang‐Wei Hsieh. The network helps show where Chang‐Wei Hsieh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chang‐Wei Hsieh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chang‐Wei Hsieh Line = papers co-authored together Chang‐Wei Hsieh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 182 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019103
2 201575
3 201973
4 202166
5 201466
6 201064
7 202062
8 201962
9 201661
10 201960
11 202159
12 202254
13 202154
14 202253
15 200752
16 202249
17 202049
18 201949
19 200848
20 202248

About Chang‐Wei Hsieh

Chang‐Wei Hsieh is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Food Science, Plant Science, Biotechnology and Pharmacology, having authored 182 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meat and Animal Product Quality (22 papers), Microbial Inactivation Methods (20 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (20 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (19 papers), Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging (15 papers), Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (13 papers), Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (12 papers) and Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (504 citations), Biochemistry (313 citations), Food Science (890 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (386 citations) and Biomaterials (433 citations). Chang‐Wei Hsieh has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, Indonesia and China. Frequent co-authors include Chao‐Kai Chang, Kuan‐Chen Cheng, Chih‐Yao Hou, Ellen Wen-Ching Ko, Shella Permatasari Santoso, Hsien‐Yi Hsu, Bara Yudhistira, Mohsen Gavahian, Jer‐An Lin and Shin‐Ping Lin. Their work appears in journals such as LWT, Molecules, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, Antioxidants and Foods.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact