International Journal of Biological Macromolecules

1.1M citations
44.6k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

  • Biomaterials top 0.05%
    • Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
    • Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
    • biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
    • Advanced Cellulose Research Studies

Papers in

    • Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging 4.4k
    • Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications 3.6k
    • biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties 2.9k
    • Advanced Cellulose Research Studies 2.8k

International Journal of Biological Macromolecules

41.2k papers receiving 1.1M citations

Peers

International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
Comparison fields: 5 of 241
  • Biomaterials 354.7k
  • Molecular Medicine 63.6k
  • Food Science 201.4k
  • Pharmaceutical Science 47.7k
  • Aquatic Science 53.3k
Replace Carbohydrate Polymers with:
Carbohydrate Polymers China
International Journal of Molecular Sciences China
Molecules China
Food Hydrocolloids China
Analytical Biochemistry United States
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications United States
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry China
Food Chemistry China
Applied and Environmental Microbiology United States
International Journal of Pharmaceutics United States
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules relative to Carbohydrate Polymers China Carbohydrate Polymers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Carbohydrate Polymers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in International Journal of Biological Macromolecules

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Journal of Biological Macromolecules with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Journal of Biological Macromolecules more than expected).

Fields of papers published in International Journal of Biological Macromolecules

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Journal of Biological Macromolecules.

About International Journal of Biological Macromolecules

The 44.6k papers published in International Journal of Biological Macromolecules in the last decades have received a total of 1.1M indexed citations . Papers published in International Journal of Biological Macromolecules usually cover Biomaterials (13.0k papers), Molecular Medicine (2.5k papers), Food Science (7.3k papers), Pharmaceutical Science (1.8k papers) and Nutrition and Dietetics (4.4k papers) specifically the topics of Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging (4.4k papers), Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls (4.4k papers), Polysaccharides Composition and Applications (3.6k papers), Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (3.6k papers), biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties (2.9k papers), Advanced Cellulose Research Studies (2.8k papers), Proteins in Food Systems (2.7k papers) and Food composition and properties (2.5k papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Journal of Biological Macromolecules are Gangliang Huang, N. Selvamurugan, Jong‐Whan Rhim, Muhammad Bilal, Sankaran Meenakshi, Khalid Mahmood Zia, R. Jayakumar, Seid Mahdi Jafari, Zahra Shariatinia‬ and Hafiz M.N. Iqbal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact