Celile Itir Göğüş
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 5%
- Strategy and Management
- Communication top 10%
- Management Science and Operations Research top 10%
- Co-authors
- Christopher O. L. H. PorterJustin W. WebbMichael J. WessonM. Sinan GönülGilad ChenElizabeth E. UmphressJohn BinghamAdam Barsky
- Topics
- Team Dynamics and Performance (6 papers)Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (6 papers)Supply Chain and Inventory Management (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- TürkiyeUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Celile Itir Göğüş
14 papers receiving 309 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Social Psychology 143
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 130
- Strategy and Management 57
- Communication 56
- Management Science and Operations Research 56
Countries citing papers authored by Celile Itir Göğüş
This map shows the geographic impact of Celile Itir Göğüş's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Celile Itir Göğüş with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Celile Itir Göğüş more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Celile Itir Göğüş
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Celile Itir Göğüş. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Celile Itir Göğüş. The network helps show where Celile Itir Göğüş may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Celile Itir Göğüş
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Celile Itir Göğüş. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Celile Itir Göğüş based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Celile Itir Göğüş. Celile Itir Göğüş is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 23 | |
| 6 | 26 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 97 | |
| 11 | 53 | |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 58 | |
| 15 | 1 |
About Celile Itir Göğüş
Celile Itir Göğüş is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Management Information Systems, having authored 15 papers that have together received 334 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Team Dynamics and Performance (6 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (6 papers) and Supply Chain and Inventory Management (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (130 citations), Communication (56 citations) and Social Psychology (143 citations). Celile Itir Göğüş has collaborated with scholars based in Türkiye, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Christopher O. L. H. Porter, Justin W. Webb, Michael J. Wesson, M. Sinan Gönül, Gilad Chen, Elizabeth E. Umphress, John Bingham, Adam Barsky, Run Ren and Kelly E. See. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of Business Ethics and Decision Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.