Oana C. Fodor

550 total citations
36 papers, 377 citations indexed

About

Oana C. Fodor is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Oana C. Fodor has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 377 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Social Psychology, 12 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 7 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. Recurrent topics in Oana C. Fodor's work include Team Dynamics and Performance (14 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (7 papers) and Communication in Education and Healthcare (6 papers). Oana C. Fodor is often cited by papers focused on Team Dynamics and Performance (14 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (7 papers) and Communication in Education and Healthcare (6 papers). Oana C. Fodor collaborates with scholars based in Romania, Netherlands and Germany. Oana C. Fodor's co-authors include Petru Lucian Curșeu, Nicoleta Meslec, Sebastian Pintea, Sandra Schruijer, Helen Pluut, Mircea Miclea, Marius T.H. Meeus, Jeroen P. de Jong, Saša Batistič and Delia Vîrgă and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, The Leadership Quarterly and Frontiers in Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Oana C. Fodor

34 papers receiving 364 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Oana C. Fodor Romania 11 174 117 84 56 47 36 377
Maria Riaz Hamdani United States 9 174 1.0× 202 1.7× 113 1.3× 36 0.6× 27 0.6× 15 428
Katerina Gonzalez United States 11 161 0.9× 190 1.6× 76 0.9× 83 1.5× 25 0.5× 16 468
Adrian H. Pitariu Canada 5 194 1.1× 211 1.8× 156 1.9× 65 1.2× 26 0.6× 7 468
Jinlong Zhu China 8 176 1.0× 285 2.4× 109 1.3× 40 0.7× 42 0.9× 21 525
Ginka Toegel United Kingdom 7 135 0.8× 198 1.7× 74 0.9× 37 0.7× 28 0.6× 7 358
David S. DeGeest United States 8 193 1.1× 231 2.0× 116 1.4× 70 1.3× 19 0.4× 13 519
Kathleen R. Keeler United States 7 154 0.9× 146 1.2× 138 1.6× 73 1.3× 16 0.3× 13 443
Éric Brunelle Canada 12 129 0.7× 150 1.3× 135 1.6× 32 0.6× 22 0.5× 29 452
Amanda Christensen-Salem United States 10 112 0.6× 285 2.4× 70 0.8× 51 0.9× 64 1.4× 14 417
Jennifer P. Green United States 7 130 0.7× 170 1.5× 97 1.2× 96 1.7× 15 0.3× 10 430

Countries citing papers authored by Oana C. Fodor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Oana C. Fodor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Oana C. Fodor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Oana C. Fodor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Oana C. Fodor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Oana C. Fodor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Oana C. Fodor. The network helps show where Oana C. Fodor may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Oana C. Fodor

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Oana C. Fodor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Oana C. Fodor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Oana C. Fodor. Oana C. Fodor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Curșeu, Petru Lucian, et al.. (2024). Believing in Change: Predicting Identification, Performance, and Ethical Culture in an Organizational Acquisition Case in Romania. Administrative Sciences. 14(10). 234–234. 1 indexed citations
2.
Meslec, Nicoleta, et al.. (2023). Multiple teams, multiple projects, multiple groups at the intersection of (multiple) research fields: A bibliometric study. Frontiers in Psychology. 14. 1027349–1027349. 2 indexed citations
5.
Curșeu, Petru Lucian, et al.. (2022). Power Differences and Dynamics in Multiparty Collaborative Systems: A Systematic Literature Review. Systems. 10(2). 30–30. 4 indexed citations
6.
Fodor, Oana C., et al.. (2022). The effect of humor and perceived social interdependence on teamwork engagement in student groups. Current Psychology. 42(27). 23830–23841. 13 indexed citations
7.
Pluut, Helen, Petru Lucian Curșeu, & Oana C. Fodor. (2022). Development and Validation of a Short Measure of Emotional, Physical, and Behavioral Markers of Eustress and Distress (MEDS). Healthcare. 10(2). 339–339. 16 indexed citations
8.
Curșeu, Petru Lucian, et al.. (2021). Death anxiety, job satisfaction and counterproductive work behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic: a comparative study of healthcare and non-healthcare professionals. Psychology Health & Medicine. 27(9). 2030–2042. 5 indexed citations
9.
Curșeu, Petru Lucian, et al.. (2021). Death anxiety, death reflection and interpersonal communication as predictors of social distance towards people infected with COVID 19. Current Psychology. 42(2). 1490–1503. 29 indexed citations
10.
Fodor, Oana C., Petru Lucian Curșeu, & Nicoleta Meslec. (2021). Multiple Team Membership, Performance, and Confidence in Estimation Tasks. Frontiers in Psychology. 12. 658827–658827. 5 indexed citations
11.
Fodor, Oana C., Petru Lucian Curșeu, & Nicoleta Meslec. (2021). In Leaders We Trust, or Should We? Supervisors’ Dark Triad Personality Traits and Ratings of Team Performance and Innovation. Frontiers in Psychology. 12. 650172–650172. 13 indexed citations
12.
Curșeu, Petru Lucian, et al.. (2021). Let’s Not Joke about It Too Much! Exposure to COVID-19 Messaging, Attitudes and Protective Behavioral Intentions. Healthcare. 9(2). 122–122. 5 indexed citations
13.
Curșeu, Petru Lucian, et al.. (2019). Communication and Group Cognitive Complexity. Small Group Research. 50(4). 539–568. 6 indexed citations
14.
Fodor, Oana C., et al.. (2018). Networks Originate in Minds: An Exploration of Trust Self-Enhancement and Network Centrality in Multiparty Systems. Administrative Sciences. 8(4). 60–60. 3 indexed citations
15.
Fodor, Oana C., et al.. (2018). Autonomy to fail : An investigation of workload, work autonomy, interpersonal relations and performance in service teams. Open University of the Netherlands Research Portal. 11–12. 1 indexed citations
16.
Curșeu, Petru Lucian, Sandra Schruijer, & Oana C. Fodor. (2017). Minority Dissent and Social Acceptance in Collaborative Learning Groups. Frontiers in Psychology. 8. 458–458. 13 indexed citations
17.
Fodor, Oana C. & Sebastian Pintea. (2017). The “Emotional Side” of Entrepreneurship: A Meta-Analysis of the Relation between Positive and Negative Affect and Entrepreneurial Performance. Frontiers in Psychology. 8. 310–310. 48 indexed citations
18.
Fodor, Oana C., et al.. (2016). Affective states and ecological rationality in entrepreneurial decision making. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 31(7). 1182–1197. 13 indexed citations
19.
Curșeu, Petru Lucian & Oana C. Fodor. (2016). Humor and group atmosphere. Team Performance Management. 22(7/8). 370–382. 17 indexed citations
20.
Meslec, Nicoleta, Petru Lucian Curșeu, Marius T.H. Meeus, & Oana C. Fodor. (2014). When None of Us Perform Better than All of Us Together: The Role of Analogical Decision Rules in Groups. PLoS ONE. 9(1). e85232–e85232. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026