Carsten C. Schermuly
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 1%
- Applied Psychology top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Bertolt MeyerCarolin GraßmannFranziska SchölmerichWolfgang SchöllSimone KauffeldJürgen DellerMeir ShemlaDominika Wach
- Topics
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (26 papers)Psychology, Coaching, and Therapy (14 papers)Coaching Methods and Impact (13 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanySwitzerlandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Carsten C. Schermuly
64 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Social Psychology 638
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 632
- Applied Psychology 292
- Sociology and Political Science 268
- Clinical Psychology 190
Countries citing papers authored by Carsten C. Schermuly
This map shows the geographic impact of Carsten C. Schermuly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carsten C. Schermuly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carsten C. Schermuly more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Carsten C. Schermuly
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carsten C. Schermuly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carsten C. Schermuly. The network helps show where Carsten C. Schermuly may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Carsten C. Schermuly
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Carsten C. Schermuly. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Carsten C. Schermuly based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Carsten C. Schermuly. Carsten C. Schermuly is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 36 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 37 | |
| 16 | 39 | |
| 17 | 96 | |
| 18 | 35 | |
| 19 | Zusammenwirken von Empowerment bei Führungskräften und Mitarbeitern auf die Mitarbeiterleistung | 1 |
| 20 | 59 |
About Carsten C. Schermuly
Carsten C. Schermuly is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Social Psychology, having authored 72 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (26 papers), Psychology, Coaching, and Therapy (14 papers) and Coaching Methods and Impact (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (632 citations), Applied Psychology (292 citations) and Social Psychology (638 citations). Carsten C. Schermuly has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Bertolt Meyer, Carolin Graßmann, Franziska Schölmerich, Wolfgang Schöll, Simone Kauffeld, Jürgen Deller, Meir Shemla, Dominika Wach, Tobias Schröder and Clemens Kirschbaum. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Ethics, Journal of Organizational Behavior and Frontiers in Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.