C. Scott Smith

567 citations
33 papers · 400 indexed · h-index 13

C. Scott Smith

33 papers receiving 378 citations

Peers

C. Scott Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Family Practice 82
  • General Health Professions 171
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 192
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 6
  • Research and Theory 4
Replace Meenakshy Aiyer with:
Meenakshy Aiyer United States
Jennifer Plant United States
Dianne P. Wagner United States
Kevin Weaver United States
Allyn Walsh Canada
Catherine Florio Pipas United States
Ted Clark United States
Jwa‐Seop Shin South Korea
Donna M. Howard United States
Michel Donoff Canada
C. Scott Smith relative to Meenakshy Aiyer United States Meenakshy Aiyer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Meenakshy Aiyer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. Scott Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Scott Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Scott Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Scott Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Scott Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Scott Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Scott Smith. The network helps show where C. Scott Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. Scott Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. Scott Smith Line = papers co-authored together C. Scott Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20231
2 202238
3 20176
4 201619
5 201514
6 201417
7 201314
8 201311
9 201310
10 201032
11 20101
12 200817
13 20086
14
A general framework for approaching residents in difficulty.
200732
15 20065
16 20064
17 20055
18 200432
19 199723
20 199533

About C. Scott Smith

C. Scott Smith is a scholar working on Family Practice, Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Anatomy, General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 33 papers that have together received 400 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (15 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (11 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (6 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (3 papers), Hospital Admissions and Outcomes (3 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (3 papers), Healthcare Systems and Technology (3 papers) and Categorization, perception, and language (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (82 citations), General Health Professions (171 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (192 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (6 citations) and Research and Theory (4 citations). C. Scott Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Mark Servis, William Hill, Nancy Stevens, Rick Tivis, William G. Weppner, Lynne Robins, Joyce E. Wipf, Andrew P. Wilper, Andrew M. Luks and Robert Bing‐You. Their work appears in journals such as Advances in Health Sciences Education, Journal of General Internal Medicine, Academic Medicine, Teaching and Learning in Medicine and Journal of Interprofessional Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026