William Hill
Impact in
- Developmental Neuroscience top 1%
- Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Neurology top 1%
- Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Papers in ⓘ
- Genetics 11
- Mesenchymal stem cell research 10
- Co-authors
- David C. Hess (11 shared papers)Angeline Martin-Studdard (5 shared papers)James E. Carroll (5 shared papers)Jennifer L. Waller (6 shared papers)Susan C. Fagan (4 shared papers)Mark W. Hamrick (15 shared papers)Carlos M. Isales (13 shared papers)Zheng Dong (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Innovation in Aging (4 papers)Inorganica Chimica Acta (4 papers)Advances in Health Sciences Education (3 papers)Journal of General Internal Medicine (3 papers)Neurobiology of Aging (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesEgyptTaiwan
In The Last Decade
William Hill
70 papers receiving 2.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
- Developmental Neuroscience 336
- Neurology 630
- Genetics 527
- Biological Psychiatry 91
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 411
Countries citing papers authored by William Hill
This map shows the geographic impact of William Hill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Hill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Hill more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Hill
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Hill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Hill. The network helps show where William Hill may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Hill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 73 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 339 | |
| 2 | 2002 | 223 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 219 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 212 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 195 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 193 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 141 | |
| 8 | 2003 | 138 | |
| 9 | 2004 | 94 | |
| 10 | 1991 | 92 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 86 | |
| 12 | 2002 | 76 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 65 | |
| 14 | 2002 | 63 | |
| 15 | 2006 | 57 | |
| 16 | 2010 | 57 | |
| 17 | 1993 | 54 | |
| 18 | 2005 | 50 | |
| 19 | 2011 | 50 | |
| 20 | 2013 | 42 |
About William Hill
William Hill is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics, Physiology, Surgery and Neurology, having authored 73 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mesenchymal stem cell research (10 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (6 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (5 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (4 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (4 papers) and Vitamin D Research Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (336 citations), Neurology (630 citations), Genetics (527 citations), Biological Psychiatry (91 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (411 citations). William Hill has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Egypt and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include David C. Hess, Angeline Martin-Studdard, James E. Carroll, Jennifer L. Waller, Susan C. Fagan, Mark W. Hamrick, Carlos M. Isales, Zheng Dong, Qingqing Wei and John Q. Trojanowski. Their work appears in journals such as Innovation in Aging, Inorganica Chimica Acta, Advances in Health Sciences Education, Journal of General Internal Medicine and Neurobiology of Aging.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.