Michel Donoff

504 total citations
21 papers, 392 citations indexed

About

Michel Donoff is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Family Practice and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Michel Donoff has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 392 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 13 papers in Family Practice and 9 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Michel Donoff's work include Innovations in Medical Education (19 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (13 papers) and Radiology practices and education (6 papers). Michel Donoff is often cited by papers focused on Innovations in Medical Education (19 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (13 papers) and Radiology practices and education (6 papers). Michel Donoff collaborates with scholars based in Canada, Russia and China. Michel Donoff's co-authors include Jocelyn Lockyer, Penny Jennett, William C. Hall, Claudio Violato, Herta Fidler, R M Lewkonia, John Toews, Stephen J. Wetmore, Paul Humphries and Shelley Ross and has published in prestigious journals such as Academic Medicine, JAMA Network Open and Medical Teacher.

In The Last Decade

Michel Donoff

21 papers receiving 368 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Michel Donoff Canada	10	311	172	154	105	41	21	392
Catherine M. Welcher United States	6	311 1.0×	116 0.7×	112 0.7×	58 0.6×	40 1.0×	8	373
Hanneke Mulder Netherlands	4	328 1.1×	130 0.8×	126 0.8×	60 0.6×	26 0.6×	9	370
Vic Neufeld Canada	5	234 0.8×	116 0.7×	89 0.6×	47 0.4×	22 0.5×	8	325
Ilona Bartman Canada	6	343 1.1×	181 1.1×	172 1.1×	67 0.6×	54 1.3×	14	481
Piyush Pushkar United Kingdom	5	382 1.2×	247 1.4×	122 0.8×	93 0.9×	10 0.2×	11	497
Craig M. Campbell Canada	9	230 0.7×	66 0.4×	122 0.8×	44 0.4×	29 0.7×	14	296
Henry Pohl United States	9	261 0.8×	98 0.6×	88 0.6×	40 0.4×	15 0.4×	13	330
Donna M. Howard United States	7	368 1.2×	129 0.8×	167 1.1×	43 0.4×	20 0.5×	9	480
Paul Grand’Maison Canada	10	264 0.8×	133 0.8×	126 0.8×	41 0.4×	34 0.8×	29	346
Catherine Florio Pipas United States	13	280 0.9×	76 0.4×	197 1.3×	31 0.3×	24 0.6×	21	394

Countries citing papers authored by Michel Donoff

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michel Donoff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michel Donoff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michel Donoff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michel Donoff

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michel Donoff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michel Donoff. The network helps show where Michel Donoff may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michel Donoff

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michel Donoff. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michel Donoff based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michel Donoff. Michel Donoff is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Ross, Shelley, Cheri Bethune, Michel Donoff, et al.. (2022). Development, Implementation, and Meta-Evaluation of a National Approach to Programmatic Assessment in Canadian Family Medicine Residency Training. Academic Medicine. 98(2). 188–198. 2 indexed citations

2.

Ross, Shelley, et al.. (2018). Association of a Competency-Based Assessment System With Identification of and Support for Medical Residents in Difficulty. JAMA Network Open. 1(7). e184581–e184581. 21 indexed citations

3.

Flook, Nigel, et al.. (2013). Family physician practice visits arising from the Alberta Physician Achievement Review. BMC Medical Education. 13(1). 121–121. 5 indexed citations

4.

Ross, Shelley, et al.. (2013). The Impact of Varying Levels of Implementation Fidelity on Resident Perceptions of an Assessment Innovation. Journal of Graduate Medical Education. 5(4). 711–711. 1 indexed citations

5.

Ross, Shelley, et al.. (2012). Involving users in the refinement of the competency-based achievement system: An innovative approach to competency-based assessment. Medical Teacher. 34(2). e143–e147. 17 indexed citations

6.

Oandasan, Ivy, et al.. (2012). Triple C: linking curriculum and assessment.. PubMed. 58(10). 1165–7, e608. 7 indexed citations

7.

Wetmore, Stephen J., et al.. (2012). Defining competency-based evaluation objectives in family medicine: communication skills.. PubMed. 58(4). e217–24. 12 indexed citations

8.

Donoff, Michel, et al.. (2012). Defining competency-based evaluation objectives in family medicine: professionalism.. PubMed. 58(10). e596–604. 7 indexed citations

9.

Wetmore, Stephen J., et al.. (2012). Defining competency-based evaluation objectives in family medicine: procedure skills.. PubMed. 58(7). 775–80. 7 indexed citations

10.

Brailovsky, Carlos, et al.. (2011). Defining competency-based evaluation objectives in family medicine. 57(10). 775–780. 10 indexed citations

11.

Brailovsky, Carlos, et al.. (2011). Defining competency-based evaluation objectives in family medicine: key-feature approach.. PubMed. 57(10). e373–80. 14 indexed citations

12.

Ross, Shelley, et al.. (2011). Competency-based achievement system: using formative feedback to teach and assess family medicine residents' skills.. PubMed. 57(9). e323–30. 30 indexed citations

13.

Ross, Shelley, Cheryl Poth, Michel Donoff, & Paul Humphries. (2010). Monitoring, Adapting, and Evaluating a Competency-Based Assessment Framework in Medical Education Through Participatory Action Research. Alberta Journal of Educational Research. 55(4). 3 indexed citations

14.

Donoff, Michel. (2009). Field notes: assisting achievement and documenting competence.. PubMed. 55(12). 1260–2, e100. 26 indexed citations

15.

Wilson, Douglas R., et al.. (2007). Improving the Quality and Capacity of Canada's Health Services: Primary Care Physician Perspectives. Healthcare policy. 3(2). e145–61. 6 indexed citations

16.

Steiner, Ivan P., Philip W. Yoon, Karen D. Kelly, et al.. (2005). The Influence of Residents Training Level on Their Evaluation of Clinical Teaching Faculty. Teaching and Learning in Medicine. 17(1). 42–48. 6 indexed citations

17.

Wilson, Douglas R., et al.. (2005). Family physicians' interest and involvement in interdisciplinary collaborative practice in Alberta, Canada. Primary Health Care Research & Development. 6(3). 224–231. 11 indexed citations

18.

Wetmore, Stephen J., et al.. (2005). Defining core procedure skills for Canadian family medicine training.. PubMed. 51. 1364–5. 38 indexed citations

19.

Steiner, Ivan P., Philip W. Yoon, Karen D. Kelly, et al.. (2003). Resident Evaluation of Clinical Teachers Based on Teachers' Certification. Academic Emergency Medicine. 10(7). 731–737. 5 indexed citations

20.

Steiner, Ivan P., Philip W. Yoon, Karen D. Kelly, et al.. (2003). Resident Evaluation of Clinical Teachers Based on Teachers' Certification. Academic Emergency Medicine. 10(7). 731–737. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact