Boram Do

965 total citations
25 papers, 651 citations indexed

About

Boram Do is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Boram Do has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 651 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 4 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Boram Do's work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (10 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (6 papers) and Organizational Learning and Leadership (3 papers). Boram Do is often cited by papers focused on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (10 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (6 papers) and Organizational Learning and Leadership (3 papers). Boram Do collaborates with scholars based in United States, South Korea and United Kingdom. Boram Do's co-authors include Jean M. Bartunek, Julia Balogun, Gayoung Lee, Shaul Oreg, Eunju Ko, Amanuel G. Tekleab, Ariel Levi, Cary M. Lichtman, Ian J. Walsh and Dan V. Caprar and has published in prestigious journals such as Academy of Management Review, Journal of Applied Psychology and Organization Science.

In The Last Decade

Boram Do

18 papers receiving 620 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Boram Do United States 9 387 154 133 120 89 25 651
Gabriele Jacobs Netherlands 13 322 0.8× 155 1.0× 239 1.8× 90 0.8× 111 1.2× 31 694
Payal Sharma United States 9 453 1.2× 161 1.0× 157 1.2× 191 1.6× 94 1.1× 15 747
Sajjad Nazir China 10 455 1.2× 175 1.1× 164 1.2× 111 0.9× 126 1.4× 21 865
Marco Berti Australia 14 295 0.8× 125 0.8× 143 1.1× 57 0.5× 48 0.5× 36 560
Xiang Yi United States 12 309 0.8× 162 1.1× 178 1.3× 106 0.9× 76 0.9× 24 718
Björn Michaelis Germany 10 346 0.9× 195 1.3× 85 0.6× 82 0.7× 48 0.5× 12 610
Johannes Rank Germany 9 497 1.3× 204 1.3× 140 1.1× 219 1.8× 65 0.7× 12 814
Dustin Bluhm United States 8 421 1.1× 161 1.0× 217 1.6× 192 1.6× 64 0.7× 17 794
Camille Pradies France 10 364 0.9× 141 0.9× 161 1.2× 113 0.9× 33 0.4× 15 591
Rebecca M. Guidice United States 14 262 0.7× 141 0.9× 97 0.7× 90 0.8× 82 0.9× 35 562

Countries citing papers authored by Boram Do

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Boram Do's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Boram Do with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Boram Do more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Boram Do

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Boram Do. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Boram Do. The network helps show where Boram Do may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Boram Do

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Boram Do. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Boram Do based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Boram Do. Boram Do is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Do, Boram, et al.. (2025). Generation Gap? The Branching Influence of Historical Myths. Organization Science. 36(5). 1881–1908.
2.
Do, Boram, et al.. (2025). An integrative conceptual review and theoretical framework of surprise in organizations.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 111(1). 18–43.
4.
Do, Boram, et al.. (2024). Effective managers of workplace safety: A topic taxonomy of manager’s safety competency. Safety Science. 176. 106528–106528. 3 indexed citations
5.
Lee, Ju Young, et al.. (2024). Perceived Calling Enablement: Achieving Positive Work Outcomes Through Unanswered Calling. Journal of Happiness Studies. 25(5).
6.
Do, Boram, et al.. (2024). ‘We Can Win this Fight Together’: Memory and Cross‐Occupational Coordination. Journal of Management Studies.
7.
Ko, Eunju, et al.. (2024). Does Luxury Fashion Shape Consumers’ Perception Differently in the Real World Versus the Metaverse? A Comparative Study on Wearer Evaluation. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 41(13). 8314–8329. 5 indexed citations
8.
Choi, Jeonghye, et al.. (2023). The Moderating Effects of Mobile Application Usage on the Relationship Between Work Stressors and Positive Affect. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association. 23(1). 464–479. 1 indexed citations
9.
Ko, Eunju, et al.. (2023). The perceived value of digital fashion product and purchase intention: the mediating role of the flow experience in metaverse platforms. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics. 35(11). 2645–2665. 70 indexed citations
10.
Do, Boram, et al.. (2022). Memory-based change management: Using the past to guide the future. Organizational Psychology Review. 12(3). 306–331. 3 indexed citations
11.
Kim, Hyejin, et al.. (2022). The effect of emotion in thumbnails and titles of video clips on pre-roll advertising effectiveness. Journal of Business Research. 151. 232–243. 11 indexed citations
12.
Do, Boram & Seung‐Yoon Rhee. (2021). University Students’ Perception of Transformational Leadership of the University President in Korea: The Role of Students’ Personality, Affect, and Affective Commitment to the University. International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research. 20(1). 160–184. 2 indexed citations
13.
Do, Boram, et al.. (2021). Exploring the Determinants of Job Satisfaction and Mobile Productivity amidst COVID-19. 22(1). 39–56. 1 indexed citations
14.
Tekleab, Amanuel G., et al.. (2020). Translating Corporate Social Responsibility into Action: A Social Learning Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics. 171(4). 741–756. 39 indexed citations
15.
Do, Boram, et al.. (2020). How Do Managers Fire Employees? A Theoretical Model of Termination Decision Making. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2020(1). 11785–11785.
16.
Oreg, Shaul, Jean M. Bartunek, Gayoung Lee, & Boram Do. (2016). An Affect-Based Model of Recipients’ Responses to Organizational Change Events. Academy of Management Review. 43(1). 65–86. 224 indexed citations
17.
Do, Boram & Myeong‐Gu Seo. (2016). The desire to reciprocate as an affective motivational state: The model of state gratitude at work. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2016(1). 12553–12553. 2 indexed citations
18.
Caprar, Dan V., Boram Do, Sara L. Rynes, & Jean M. Bartunek. (2015). It’s Personal: An Exploration of Students’ (Non)Acceptance of Management Research. Academy of Management Learning and Education. 15(2). 207–231. 19 indexed citations
19.
Balogun, Julia, Jean M. Bartunek, & Boram Do. (2010). UNCOVERING RELATIONSHIPS AND SHARED EMOTION BENEATH SENIOR MANAGERS' RESISTANCE TO STRATEGIC CHANGE.. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2010(1). 1–6. 4 indexed citations
20.
Do, Boram & Seung‐Yoon Rhee. (2008). Followers` Perception of Distant Leaders` Transformational Leadership: The Effect of Followers` Personality, Affect, and Organizational Commitment. 1–30. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026