Antje Risius

983 total citations · 1 hit paper
34 papers, 683 citations indexed

About

Antje Risius is a scholar working on Ecology, Plant Science and Food Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Antje Risius has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 683 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Ecology, 14 papers in Plant Science and 10 papers in Food Science. Recurrent topics in Antje Risius's work include Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (15 papers), Organic Food and Agriculture (13 papers) and Environmental Sustainability in Business (7 papers). Antje Risius is often cited by papers focused on Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (15 papers), Organic Food and Agriculture (13 papers) and Environmental Sustainability in Business (7 papers). Antje Risius collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Italy. Antje Risius's co-authors include Ulrich Hamm, Meike Janßen, Achim Spiller, Gesa Busch, Marco A. Palma, Elke Pawelzik, Bachir Kassas, Brianne A. Altmann, Daniel Mörlein and Maureen Schulze and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Cleaner Production and Nutrients.

In The Last Decade

Antje Risius

31 papers receiving 669 citations

Hit Papers

Recommendations to address the shortfalls of the EAT–Lanc... 2025 2026 2025 4 8 12

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Antje Risius Germany 14 239 217 172 157 97 34 683
Eugenio Demartini Italy 20 251 1.1× 265 1.2× 268 1.6× 137 0.9× 86 0.9× 49 886
Anna Gaviglio Italy 19 250 1.0× 243 1.1× 251 1.5× 122 0.8× 70 0.7× 51 844
P. Gaspar Spain 17 229 1.0× 144 0.7× 209 1.2× 125 0.8× 43 0.4× 39 863
Adriano Profeta Germany 16 259 1.1× 380 1.8× 194 1.1× 120 0.8× 111 1.1× 38 890
Luís Kluwe de Aguiar United Kingdom 13 358 1.5× 315 1.5× 108 0.6× 138 0.9× 105 1.1× 37 811
Themistoklis Altintzoglou Norway 20 131 0.5× 449 2.1× 140 0.8× 208 1.3× 170 1.8× 42 1000
Marija Banović Denmark 18 262 1.1× 618 2.8× 262 1.5× 296 1.9× 182 1.9× 47 1.2k
A.P.W. Kole Netherlands 10 142 0.6× 254 1.2× 132 0.8× 81 0.5× 37 0.4× 20 581
Terhi Latvala Finland 13 318 1.3× 288 1.3× 204 1.2× 85 0.5× 84 0.9× 25 709
Janneke de Jonge Netherlands 16 144 0.6× 497 2.3× 223 1.3× 241 1.5× 77 0.8× 16 1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Antje Risius

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Antje Risius's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Antje Risius with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Antje Risius more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Antje Risius

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Antje Risius. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Antje Risius. The network helps show where Antje Risius may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Antje Risius

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Antje Risius. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Antje Risius based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Antje Risius. Antje Risius is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Risius, Antje, et al.. (2025). From forest immersion to sustainable choices: a systematic approach to the impact of nature exposure on behaviour. Journal of Cleaner Production. 533. 146985–146985.
2.
Ndinda, Catherine, et al.. (2025). Recommendations to address the shortfalls of the EAT–Lancet planetary health diet from a plant-forward perspective. The Lancet Planetary Health. 9(1). e23–e33. 13 indexed citations breakdown →
3.
Risius, Antje, et al.. (2023). Personality traits and meat consumption: The mediating role of animal-related ethical concerns. Frontiers in Psychology. 13. 995482–995482. 2 indexed citations
5.
Risius, Antje, et al.. (2022). A Global Analysis of National Dietary Guidelines on Plant-Based Diets and Substitutions for Animal-Based Foods. Current Developments in Nutrition. 6(11). nzac144–nzac144. 42 indexed citations
7.
Risius, Antje, et al.. (2021). Motives, mentalities and dietary change: An exploration of the factors that drive and sustain alternative dietary lifestyles. Appetite. 165. 105425–105425. 10 indexed citations
8.
Spiller, Achim, et al.. (2021). Who Wants Chicken? Uncovering Consumer Preferences for Produce of Alternative Chicken Product Methods. Sustainability. 13(5). 2440–2440. 16 indexed citations
9.
Schulze, Maureen, Achim Spiller, & Antje Risius. (2021). Co-ops 2.0: Alternative Retail Strategies to Support a Sustainable Transition in Food Retailing. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2.
10.
Schulze, Maureen, Antje Risius, & Achim Spiller. (2021). Public perceptions of undercover investigations in livestock farming: An end that justifies the means?. Animal Welfare. 30(1). 39–47. 1 indexed citations
11.
Schulze, Maureen, Achim Spiller, & Antje Risius. (2021). Do consumers prefer pasture-raised dual-purpose cattle when considering meat products? A hypothetical discrete choice experiment for the case of minced beef. Meat Science. 177. 108494–108494. 24 indexed citations
12.
Busch, Gesa, et al.. (2020). My Meat Does Not Have Feathers: Consumers’ Associations with Pictures of Different Chicken Breeds. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 33(3-6). 505–529. 7 indexed citations
13.
Risius, Antje, et al.. (2020). Signs of Warning: Do Health Warning Messages on Sweets Affect the Neural Prefrontal Cortex Activity?. Nutrients. 12(12). 3903–3903. 8 indexed citations
14.
Busch, Gesa, Bachir Kassas, Marco A. Palma, & Antje Risius. (2020). Perceptions of antibiotic use in livestock farming in Germany, Italy and the United States. Livestock Science. 241. 104251–104251. 57 indexed citations
15.
Risius, Antje, Ulrich Hamm, & Meike Janßen. (2018). Target groups for fish from aquaculture: Consumer segmentation based on sustainability attributes and country of origin. Aquaculture. 499. 341–347. 53 indexed citations
16.
Risius, Antje & Ulrich Hamm. (2018). Exploring Influences of Different Communication Approaches on Consumer Target Groups for Ethically Produced Beef. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 31(3). 325–340. 15 indexed citations
17.
Sonntag, Winnie Isabel, et al.. (2017). Consumers require higher animal welfare standards - are they willing to pay for them? Key for the marketing of higher animal welfare meat products.. ˜Die œFleischwirtschaft. 97(10). 102–105. 1 indexed citations
18.
Risius, Antje, Meike Janßen, & Ulrich Hamm. (2017). Consumer preferences for sustainable aquaculture products: Evidence from in-depth interviews, think aloud protocols and choice experiments. Appetite. 113. 246–254. 97 indexed citations
19.
Zander, Katrin, Antje Risius, Yvonne Feucht, Meike Janßen, & Ulrich Hamm. (2017). Sustainable Aquaculture Products: Implications of Consumer Awareness and of Consumer Preferences for Promising Market Communication in Germany. Journal of Aquatic Food Product Technology. 27(1). 5–20. 38 indexed citations
20.
Risius, Antje & Ulrich Hamm. (2016). The effect of information on beef husbandry systems on consumers’ preferences and willingness to pay. Meat Science. 124. 9–14. 76 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026