Gesa Busch

821 total citations
49 papers, 543 citations indexed

About

Gesa Busch is a scholar working on Small Animals, Ecology and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Gesa Busch has authored 49 papers receiving a total of 543 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Small Animals, 17 papers in Ecology and 12 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Gesa Busch's work include Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (18 papers), Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (15 papers) and Organic Food and Agriculture (9 papers). Gesa Busch is often cited by papers focused on Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (18 papers), Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (15 papers) and Organic Food and Agriculture (9 papers). Gesa Busch collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Italy and United States. Gesa Busch's co-authors include Achim Spiller, M.A.G. von Keyserlingk, Daniel M. Weary, Antje Risius, Marco A. Palma, Bachir Kassas, Sarah Kühl, Ramona Weinrich, Matthias Gauly and B. Schulze and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Journal of Cleaner Production.

In The Last Decade

Gesa Busch

47 papers receiving 522 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Gesa Busch Germany 12 186 154 153 89 75 49 543
Carolien de Lauwere Netherlands 10 144 0.8× 128 0.8× 110 0.7× 65 0.7× 43 0.6× 15 432
B.K. Boogaard Netherlands 12 280 1.5× 247 1.6× 191 1.2× 179 2.0× 87 1.2× 25 794
Wílmer S. Sepúlveda Colombia 14 194 1.0× 134 0.9× 178 1.2× 93 1.0× 187 2.5× 34 630
Jo Bijttebier Belgium 15 83 0.4× 128 0.8× 174 1.1× 40 0.4× 78 1.0× 28 606
Melissa G.S. McKendree United States 8 163 0.9× 98 0.6× 109 0.7× 91 1.0× 55 0.7× 25 366
Courtney Bir United States 16 128 0.7× 101 0.7× 140 0.9× 139 1.6× 98 1.3× 53 632
Sarah Kühl Germany 10 95 0.5× 136 0.9× 98 0.6× 36 0.4× 74 1.0× 36 331
Marija Klopčić Slovenia 14 182 1.0× 90 0.6× 112 0.7× 173 1.9× 169 2.3× 57 747
Inken Christoph‐Schulz Germany 9 125 0.7× 115 0.7× 78 0.5× 53 0.6× 36 0.5× 38 276
A.P. Bos Netherlands 14 90 0.5× 116 0.8× 95 0.6× 36 0.4× 36 0.5× 28 560

Countries citing papers authored by Gesa Busch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gesa Busch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gesa Busch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gesa Busch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gesa Busch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gesa Busch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gesa Busch. The network helps show where Gesa Busch may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gesa Busch

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gesa Busch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gesa Busch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gesa Busch. Gesa Busch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rauch, Elke, et al.. (2025). Farmers’ experiences of implementing cow-calf-contact systems on organic dairy farms. animal. 19(7). 101568–101568.
2.
Kühl, Sarah, et al.. (2024). Willingness to pay for a multi-level animal husbandry label: an analysis of German meat consumers. British Food Journal. 126(5). 2099–2121. 3 indexed citations
3.
4.
Busch, Gesa, et al.. (2024). Positive public attitudes towards agricultural robots. Scientific Reports. 14(1). 15607–15607. 10 indexed citations
5.
Busch, Gesa. (2023). Social aspects of livestock farming around the globe. Animal Frontiers. 13(1). 3–4. 1 indexed citations
6.
Schulze, Maureen, Sarah Kühl, & Gesa Busch. (2023). We have Some Calves left! Socially Accepted Alternatives to the Current Handling of Male Calves from Dairy Production. CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School). 8(2). 9 indexed citations
7.
Busch, Gesa, Achim Spiller, & Sarah Kühl. (2023). Review: Ethical responsibilities and transformation strategies of focal companies in the meat supply chain: the implementation dilemma. animal. 17. 100915–100915. 4 indexed citations
8.
Spiller, Achim, et al.. (2023). Can consumers understand that there is more to palm oil than deforestation?. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 39. 495–505. 14 indexed citations
9.
Kühl, Sarah, et al.. (2023). Making animal welfare labelling more transparent – The potential of different information types from simple text to highly immersive stable tours via VR glasses. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research. 14. 100712–100712. 4 indexed citations
10.
Sidali, Katia Laura, et al.. (2022). Assessing preferences for mountain wine and viticulture by using a best-worst scaling approach: do mountains really matter for Italians?. Wine Economics and Policy. 11(1). 15–29. 1 indexed citations
11.
Kurz, Katharina, et al.. (2022). Virtual farm tours—Virtual reality glasses and tablets are suitable tools to provide insights into pig husbandry. PLoS ONE. 17(1). e0261248–e0261248. 12 indexed citations
12.
Weinrich, Ramona & Gesa Busch. (2021). Consumer knowledge about protein sources and consumers’ openness to feeding micro-algae and insects to pigs and poultry. Future Foods. 4. 100100–100100. 20 indexed citations
13.
Busch, Gesa, et al.. (2020). My Meat Does Not Have Feathers: Consumers’ Associations with Pictures of Different Chicken Breeds. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 33(3-6). 505–529. 7 indexed citations
14.
Busch, Gesa, et al.. (2020). Der Markt für Milch und Milcherzeugnisse im Jahr 2019. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 69(Supplement). 3 indexed citations
15.
Busch, Gesa, Matthias Gauly, & Achim Spiller. (2018). Opinion paper: What needs to be changed for successful future livestock farming in Europe?. animal. 12(10). 1999–2001. 15 indexed citations
16.
Busch, Gesa, et al.. (2017). I Spy with my Little Eye: An Eye-tracking Study regarding the Perception and Evaluation of Pictures from Pig Fattening Barns. German Journal of Agricultural Economics. 66(2). 2 indexed citations
17.
Busch, Gesa, Daniel M. Weary, Achim Spiller, & M.A.G. von Keyserlingk. (2017). American and German attitudes towards cow-calf separation on dairy farms. PLoS ONE. 12(3). e0174013–e0174013. 100 indexed citations
18.
Busch, Gesa, et al.. (2015). Citizens’ Evaluation of Animal Welfare on Pictures of Intensive Broiler Fattening: A Survey Experiment. German Journal of Agricultural Economics. 64(3). 3 indexed citations
19.
Schulze, B., et al.. (2014). Supply chain orientation in SMEs as an attitudinal construct. Supply Chain Management An International Journal. 19(4). 395–412. 34 indexed citations
20.
Busch, Gesa, et al.. (2009). Entwicklungsperspektiven der Milchproduktion in verschiedenen Regionen Niedersachsens - ein agri benchmark dairy-Projekt. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA). 69. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Carolien de Lauwere Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by B.K. Boogaard Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Wílmer S. Sepúlveda Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jo Bijttebier Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Melissa G.S. McKendree Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Courtney Bir Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sarah Kühl Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Marija Klopčić Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Inken Christoph‐Schulz Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by A.P. Bos
Rankless by CCL
2026