Anne Foegen

1.6k total citations
41 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Anne Foegen is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Statistics and Probability. According to data from OpenAlex, Anne Foegen has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in Education, 28 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 21 papers in Statistics and Probability. Recurrent topics in Anne Foegen's work include Reading and Literacy Development (22 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (20 papers) and Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (9 papers). Anne Foegen is often cited by papers focused on Reading and Literacy Development (22 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (20 papers) and Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (9 papers). Anne Foegen collaborates with scholars based in United States and Türkiye. Anne Foegen's co-authors include Stanley L. Deno, Erica S. Lembke, Christine A. Espin, Jon R. Star, Bradley S. Witzel, Benjamin Clarke, Russell Gersten, Sybilla Beckmann, Pamela M. Stecker and Rose M. Allinder and has published in prestigious journals such as Exceptional Children, The Journal of Special Education and Remedial and Special Education.

In The Last Decade

Anne Foegen

38 papers receiving 938 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anne Foegen United States 15 784 705 688 80 58 41 1.1k
Hank Fien United States 22 934 1.2× 905 1.3× 747 1.1× 120 1.5× 61 1.1× 81 1.4k
Ben Clarke United States 18 1.1k 1.4× 910 1.3× 1.1k 1.6× 73 0.9× 46 0.8× 97 1.4k
Christian T. Doabler United States 17 761 1.0× 734 1.0× 692 1.0× 146 1.8× 57 1.0× 79 1.1k
Paul Morphy United States 9 921 1.2× 933 1.3× 463 0.7× 114 1.4× 41 0.7× 10 1.3k
Bradley S. Witzel United States 14 653 0.8× 524 0.7× 607 0.9× 77 1.0× 53 0.9× 31 908
Erica S. Lembke United States 19 691 0.9× 692 1.0× 316 0.5× 143 1.8× 111 1.9× 72 1.1k
Robin F. Schumacher United States 15 737 0.9× 565 0.8× 844 1.2× 51 0.6× 18 0.3× 25 1.0k
Kathy Karns United States 11 553 0.7× 479 0.7× 219 0.3× 166 2.1× 51 0.9× 17 815
Christopher B. Wolfe United States 11 801 1.0× 389 0.6× 586 0.9× 31 0.4× 53 0.9× 17 958
Joan Bryant United States 8 839 1.1× 979 1.4× 1.0k 1.5× 50 0.6× 76 1.3× 9 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Anne Foegen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Foegen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Foegen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Foegen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Foegen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Foegen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Foegen. The network helps show where Anne Foegen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne Foegen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne Foegen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne Foegen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne Foegen. Anne Foegen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Foegen, Anne, et al.. (2019). Technical Adequacy of Procedural and Conceptual Algebra Screening Measures in High School Algebra. Assessment for Effective Intervention. 46(2). 121–131. 3 indexed citations
2.
Foegen, Anne, et al.. (2016). Early Numeracy Indicators. Remedial and Special Education. 37(3). 159–171. 11 indexed citations
3.
Star, Jon R., et al.. (2015). Teaching Strategies for Improving Algebra Knowledge in Middle and High School Students. Educator's Practice Guide. What Works Clearinghouse.™ NCEE 2015-4010.. 1 indexed citations
4.
Gersten, Russell, Sybilla Beckmann, Benjamin Clarke, et al.. (2009). Assisting students struggling with mathematics: Response to intervention (RtI) for elementary and middle schools.. Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University). 138 indexed citations
5.
Gersten, Russell, Sybilla Beckmann, Benjamin Clarke, et al.. (2009). Assisting Students Struggling with Mathematics: Response to Intervention (RtI) for Elementary and Middle Schools. NCEE 2009-4060.. 211 indexed citations
6.
Foegen, Anne, et al.. (2008). Developing Progress Monitoring Measures for Secondary Mathematics. Assessment for Effective Intervention. 33(4). 240–249. 24 indexed citations
7.
Lembke, Erica S., et al.. (2008). Establishing Technically Adequate Measures of Progress in Early Numeracy. Assessment for Effective Intervention. 33(4). 206–214. 22 indexed citations
8.
Foegen, Anne. (2008). Progress Monitoring in Middle School Mathematics. Remedial and Special Education. 29(4). 195–207. 27 indexed citations
9.
Foegen, Anne. (2008). Algebra Progress Monitoring and Interventions for Students with Learning Disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly. 31(2). 65–78. 23 indexed citations
10.
Foegen, Anne, et al.. (2007). Effects of Teachers' Access to Student Data on Algebra Progress. Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University). 2 indexed citations
11.
Foegen, Anne, et al.. (2007). Classroom Observation Data for District B: Anecdotal Observation Results. Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University).
12.
Foegen, Anne, et al.. (2007). Progress Monitoring Measures in Mathematics. The Journal of Special Education. 41(2). 121–139. 153 indexed citations
13.
Foegen, Anne, et al.. (2006). Reliability, Criterion Validity and Sensitivity to Growth: Extending Work on Two Algebra Progress Monitoring Measures. Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University). 5 indexed citations
14.
Foegen, Anne, et al.. (2005). Reliability and Criterion Validity of Four Revised Algebra Measures in Districts B and C. Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University). 5 indexed citations
15.
Foegen, Anne, et al.. (2005). Reliability and Criterion Validity of Five Algebra Measures in Districts B and C. Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University). 3 indexed citations
16.
Foegen, Anne, et al.. (2002). Constructive Conflict Resolution for Students with Behavioral Disorders.. Behavioral Disorders. 27(3). 289. 3 indexed citations
17.
Foegen, Anne, et al.. (2001). Translating Research Into Practice. The Journal of Special Education. 34(4). 226–236. 39 indexed citations
18.
Foegen, Anne & Stanley L. Deno. (2001). Identifying Growth Indicators for Low-Achieving Students in Middle School Mathematics. The Journal of Special Education. 35(1). 4–16. 47 indexed citations
19.
Foegen, Anne. (2000). Technical Adequacy of General Outcome Measures for Middle School Mathematics. Diagnostique. 25(3). 175–203. 25 indexed citations
20.
Espin, Christine A. & Anne Foegen. (1996). Validity of General Outcome Measures for Predicting Secondary Students' Performance on Content-Area Tasks. Exceptional Children. 62(6). 497–514. 104 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026