Anna Cleaves
Impact in
- Safety Research top 5%
- Career Development and Diversity
-
- Educational Games and Gamification
- Science Education and Perceptions
- Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Science Education and Pedagogy 5
- Education and Critical Thinking Development 2
- Online and Blended Learning 1
- Education and Technology Integration 1
-
- Science Education and Perceptions 2
- Co-authors
- Robert E. Horn (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Research in Science & Technological Education (2 papers)The Curriculum Journal (1 paper)International Journal of Science Education (1 paper)Journal of Biological Education (1 paper)Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Anna Cleaves
8 papers receiving 267 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Safety Research 89
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 96
- Education 176
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 47
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25
Countries citing papers authored by Anna Cleaves
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Cleaves's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Cleaves with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Cleaves more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Cleaves
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Cleaves. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Cleaves. The network helps show where Anna Cleaves may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside Anna Cleaves, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 187 | |
| 2 | The guide to simulations-games for education and training. | 1980 | 93 |
| 3 | 2007 | 14 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 5 | |
| 6 | Science investigation: The views of fourteen to sixteen year old pupils | 2006 | 5 |
| 7 | Assessment of practical and enquiry skills: Lessons to be learnt from pupils’ views | 2007 | 4 |
| 8 | 2010 | 2 |
About Anna Cleaves
Anna Cleaves is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science and Information Systems, having authored 8 papers that have together received 316 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Science Education and Pedagogy (5 papers), Science Education and Perceptions (2 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (2 papers), Online and Blended Learning (1 paper), Career Development and Diversity (1 paper), Education and Technology Integration (1 paper), Mobile Learning in Education (1 paper) and Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (89 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (96 citations), Education (176 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (47 citations) and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (25 citations). Anna Cleaves has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robert E. Horn. Their work appears in journals such as Research in Science & Technological Education, The Curriculum Journal, International Journal of Science Education, Journal of Biological Education and Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.