Anika de Mul
- Food Science top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis top 5%
- Plant Science
- Cancer Research
- Co-authors
- Wilma WaterlanderIngrid HM SteenhuisJ.D. van KlaverenPolly BoonHilko van der VoetGerda van DonkersgoedMartine BakkerS.P.J. van Leeuwen
- Topics
- Potato Plant Research (4 papers)Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (4 papers)Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Health, Toxicology and MutagenesisFood SciencePublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsSwitzerlandGuinea-Bissau
In The Last Decade
Anika de Mul
13 papers receiving 654 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Food Science 225
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 189
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 177
- Plant Science 155
- Cancer Research 55
Countries citing papers authored by Anika de Mul
This map shows the geographic impact of Anika de Mul's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anika de Mul with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anika de Mul more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anika de Mul
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anika de Mul. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anika de Mul. The network helps show where Anika de Mul may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anika de Mul
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anika de Mul. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anika de Mul based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anika de Mul. Anika de Mul is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 162 | |
| 2 | 32 | |
| 3 | 49 | |
| 4 | 51 | |
| 5 | 73 | |
| 6 | 39 | |
| 7 | 57 | |
| 8 | 83 | |
| 9 | Levels of Brominated Flame Retardants in Dutch fish and Shellfish including an estimation of the dietary intake | 2 |
| 10 | 44 | |
| 11 | Dietary intake of brominated diphenyl ether congeners by the Dutch population | 2 |
| 12 | 71 | |
| 13 | 23 |
About Anika de Mul
Anika de Mul is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Food Science and Pollution, having authored 13 papers that have together received 688 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Potato Plant Research (4 papers), Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (4 papers) and Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (177 citations), Food Science (225 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (189 citations). Anika de Mul has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Switzerland and Guinea-Bissau. Frequent co-authors include Wilma Waterlander, Ingrid HM Steenhuis, J.D. van Klaveren, Polly Boon, Hilko van der Voet, Gerda van Donkersgoed, Martine Bakker, S.P.J. van Leeuwen, Marco J. Zeilmaker and Albertine J. Schuit. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemical Pharmacology, British Journal Of Nutrition and Food and Chemical Toxicology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.