Food and Chemical Toxicology

12.6k papers and 478.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 12.6k papers published in Food and Chemical Toxicology in the last decades have received a total of 478.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Food and Chemical Toxicology usually cover Molecular Biology (3.4k papers), Plant Science (2.9k papers) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (2.3k papers) specifically the topics of Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (1.6k papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (1.0k papers) and Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food (797 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Food and Chemical Toxicology are George A. Burdock, Derek Grant, Isabel C.F.R. Ferreira, Mohamed Idaomar, Fadil Bakkali, D. Averbeck, Simone Averbeck, Mokhtar I. Yousef, Mustafa Tüzen and A.M. Api.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Food and Chemical Toxicology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Food and Chemical Toxicology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Food and Chemical Toxicology.

Countries where authors publish in Food and Chemical Toxicology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Food and Chemical Toxicology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Food and Chemical Toxicology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Food and Chemical Toxicology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025