Andrew Wild
Impact in
-
- Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Education top 5%
- Science Education and Pedagogy
- Education and Critical Thinking Development
Papers in
-
- Science Education and Pedagogy 4
- Education and Critical Thinking Development 2
-
- Educational Strategies and Epistemologies 4
- Co-authors
- Jonathan Osborne (2 shared papers)Anna MacPherson (2 shared papers)J. Bryan Henderson (2 shared papers)Evan Szu (1 shared paper)Bryan A. Brown (2 shared papers)Rachel A. Lotan (1 shared paper)Nicole Holthuis (1 shared paper)Jennifer Saltzman (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- International Journal of Science Education (2 papers)Science Education (2 papers)Journal of Professional Capital and Community (1 paper)Journal of Research in Science Teaching (1 paper)The Journal of Organic Chemistry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaSingapore
In The Last Decade
Andrew Wild
10 papers receiving 356 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 207
- Education 270
- Linguistics and Language 28
- Literature and Literary Theory 42
- Computer Science Applications 17
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Wild
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Wild's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Wild with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Wild more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Wild
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Wild. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Wild. The network helps show where Andrew Wild may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Andrew Wild, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 179 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 75 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 45 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 27 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 3 |
About Andrew Wild
Andrew Wild is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Organic Chemistry and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 10 papers that have together received 375 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Science Education and Pedagogy (4 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (4 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (2 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (1 paper), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper), Oxidative Organic Chemistry Reactions (1 paper), Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper) and EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (207 citations), Education (270 citations), Linguistics and Language (28 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (42 citations) and Computer Science Applications (17 citations). Andrew Wild has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan Osborne, Anna MacPherson, J. Bryan Henderson, Evan Szu, Bryan A. Brown, Rachel A. Lotan, Nicole Holthuis, Jennifer Saltzman, Brian Donovan and Jacqui Rodgers. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Science Education, Science Education, Journal of Professional Capital and Community, Journal of Research in Science Teaching and The Journal of Organic Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.