Anna MacPherson

1.0k total citations
22 papers, 759 citations indexed

About

Anna MacPherson is a scholar working on Education, Social Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna MacPherson has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 759 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Education, 6 papers in Social Psychology and 6 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Anna MacPherson's work include Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (4 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (4 papers) and Animal and Plant Science Education (4 papers). Anna MacPherson is often cited by papers focused on Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (4 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (4 papers) and Animal and Plant Science Education (4 papers). Anna MacPherson collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Anna MacPherson's co-authors include Klaus Dinkel, Robert M. Sapolsky, Andrew Wild, Jonathan Osborne, J. Bryan Henderson, Evan Szu, Aashish Vyas, Catherine Walshe, Mary A. Sewell and Nann A. Fangue and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neurochemistry, Experimental Neurology and Sustainability.

In The Last Decade

Anna MacPherson

21 papers receiving 729 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anna MacPherson United States 10 239 201 99 91 82 22 759
Melissa Burt United States 12 57 0.2× 14 0.1× 30 0.3× 29 0.3× 36 0.4× 25 561
Qin Zhang China 22 62 0.3× 113 0.6× 26 0.3× 57 0.6× 7 0.1× 89 1.4k
D. Pope United States 10 32 0.1× 25 0.1× 10 0.1× 8 0.1× 23 0.3× 15 1.1k
Wenfu Li China 21 49 0.2× 38 0.2× 53 0.5× 35 0.4× 69 1.3k
Granville J. Matheson Sweden 14 21 0.1× 25 0.1× 49 0.5× 78 0.9× 3 0.0× 33 724
Xiaoping Jiang China 16 60 0.3× 14 0.1× 6 0.1× 133 1.5× 39 0.5× 49 833
Elizabeth A. Egan United States 15 171 0.7× 64 0.3× 3 0.0× 2 0.0× 78 1.0× 31 939
Vito A. G. Ricigliano France 15 9 0.0× 15 0.1× 11 0.1× 95 1.0× 10 0.1× 29 1.1k
Elizabeth Riley United States 19 60 0.3× 17 0.1× 13 0.1× 18 0.2× 67 1.1k
Edwin van den Oord United States 14 50 0.2× 22 0.1× 22 0.2× 21 0.2× 25 1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Anna MacPherson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna MacPherson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna MacPherson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna MacPherson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna MacPherson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna MacPherson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna MacPherson. The network helps show where Anna MacPherson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna MacPherson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna MacPherson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna MacPherson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna MacPherson. Anna MacPherson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Björklund, Peter, Preeti Gupta, Karen Hammerness, et al.. (2025). Finding peers “like me”: Student strategies for increasing belonging and flourishing in STEM. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 97. 101758–101758. 1 indexed citations
2.
Hammerness, Karen, Preeti Gupta, Peter Björklund, et al.. (2024). From opportunity gap to opportunity yield: The benefits of out-of-school authentic mentored research for youth from historically marginalized communities in STEM. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 94. 101694–101694. 3 indexed citations
3.
Hammerness, Karen, Peter Björklund, Alan J. Daly, et al.. (2024). The role of flourishing in the STEM trajectories of emerging adults. Frontiers in Education. 9. 2 indexed citations
4.
MacPherson, Anna, Peter Björklund, Alan J. Daly, et al.. (2024). Pipeline Schmipeline: A New Survey to Examine Youth Pathways in Science. Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education. 126(4-5). 220–237. 3 indexed citations
5.
Hammerness, Karen, et al.. (2023). What we've learned: A research agenda for a museum, 7 years later. Curator The Museum Journal. 66(4). 589–608.
6.
MacPherson, Anna, et al.. (2023). A Learning Progression for Understanding Interdependent Relationships in Ecosystems. Sustainability. 15(19). 14212–14212. 1 indexed citations
8.
Hammerness, Karen, et al.. (2021). Partnerships to offer advanced learning for all students. Phi Delta Kappan. 103(4). 49–53. 2 indexed citations
9.
MacPherson, Anna, et al.. (2021). Fighting “bad science” in the information age: The effects of an intervention to stimulate evaluation and critique of false scientific claims. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 58(8). 1152–1178. 21 indexed citations
10.
MacPherson, Anna. (2020). A Learning Progression for Interdependent Relationships in Ecosystems. Proceedings of the 2020 AERA Annual Meeting. 1 indexed citations
11.
Menge, Duncan N. L., et al.. (2018). Logarithmic scales in ecological data presentation may cause misinterpretation. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 2(9). 1393–1402. 40 indexed citations
12.
Hammerness, Karen, et al.. (2017). What does it take to sustain a productive partnership in education?. Phi Delta Kappan. 99(1). 15–20. 5 indexed citations
13.
Osborne, Jonathan, et al.. (2016). The development and validation of a learning progression for argumentation in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 53(6). 821–846. 179 indexed citations
14.
MacPherson, Anna. (2016). A Comparison of Scientists’ Arguments and School Argumentation Tasks. Science Education. 100(6). 1062–1091. 8 indexed citations
15.
Henderson, J. Bryan, Anna MacPherson, Jonathan Osborne, & Andrew Wild. (2015). Beyond Construction: Five arguments for the role and value of critique in learning science. International Journal of Science Education. 37(10). 1668–1697. 75 indexed citations
16.
MacPherson, Anna, et al.. (2013). Teaching the difficult-to-teach topics. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. 4(1). 87–91. 17 indexed citations
17.
MacPherson, Anna, et al.. (2012). The views of patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on advance care planning: A qualitative study. Palliative Medicine. 27(3). 265–272. 58 indexed citations
18.
Fangue, Nann A., Michael J. O’Donnell, Mary A. Sewell, et al.. (2010). A laboratory‐based, experimental system for the study of ocean acidification effects on marine invertebrate larvae. Limnology and Oceanography Methods. 8(8). 441–452. 86 indexed citations
19.
MacPherson, Anna, Klaus Dinkel, & Robert M. Sapolsky. (2005). Glucocorticoids worsen excitotoxin-induced expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in hippocampal cultures. Experimental Neurology. 194(2). 376–383. 93 indexed citations
20.
Dinkel, Klaus, Anna MacPherson, & Robert M. Sapolsky. (2003). Novel glucocorticoid effects on acute inflammation in the CNS. Journal of Neurochemistry. 84(4). 705–716. 143 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026