Wiktor Razmus

31 papers receiving 414 citations

Peers

Wiktor Razmus
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Marketing 159
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 121
  • Applied Psychology 40
  • Business and International Management 15
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 50
Replace Nadia Crittenden with:
Nadia Crittenden Australia
Priyanka D. Joshi United States
John J. Hetts United States
Al K. C. Au Singapore
Susie S. Cox United States
Matthew T. Luth United States
Kimberly E. Chaney United States
Haiyang Liu China
Ashley Elizabeth Hardin United States
Joost Miedema Netherlands
Wiktor Razmus relative to Nadia Crittenden Australia Nadia Crittenden's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×
Nadia Crittenden · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wiktor Razmus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wiktor Razmus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wiktor Razmus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wiktor Razmus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wiktor Razmus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wiktor Razmus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wiktor Razmus. The network helps show where Wiktor Razmus may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Wiktor Razmus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wiktor Razmus Line = papers co-authored together Wiktor Razmus links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201764
2 201753
3 201641
4 201835
5 201731
6 201824
7 201623
8 202021
9 202119
10 202218
11 202215
12 202013
13 202310
14 20199
15 20237
16 20236
17 20195
18 20175
19 20244
20 20184

About Wiktor Razmus

Wiktor Razmus is a scholar working on Marketing, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Clinical Psychology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 430 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (17 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (8 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (6 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (3 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (3 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (3 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers) and Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (159 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (121 citations), Applied Psychology (40 citations), Business and International Management (15 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (50 citations). Wiktor Razmus has collaborated with scholars based in Poland, Austria and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mariola Łaguna, Magdalena Razmus, Sonja Grabner‐Kräuter, Juan A. Moriano, Marjan J. Gorgievski, Beata Zarzycka, Tracy L. Tylka, Marija Jović, Marko Jović and Anna Maria Zawadzka. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Body Image, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Journal of Beliefs and Values and Journal of Research in Personality.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact