Catherine M. Sabiston
- Clinical Psychology top 0.2%
- Social Psychology top 0.2%
- Physiology top 0.5%
- Oncology top 1%
- Applied Psychology top 0.1%
- Co-authors
- Jennifer BrunetPeter R.E. CrockerJennifer O’LoughlinMeghan H. McDonoughEva PilaKent C. KowalskiGarcia Ashdown‐FranksBrendon Stubbs
- Topics
- Cancer survivorship and care (117 papers)Eating Disorders and Behaviors (100 papers)Physical Activity and Health (94 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical OncologySHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Catherine M. Sabiston
360 papers receiving 10.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 151
- Clinical Psychology 3.6k
- Social Psychology 2.9k
- Physiology 2.3k
- Oncology 2.2k
- Applied Psychology 2.0k
Countries citing papers authored by Catherine M. Sabiston
This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine M. Sabiston's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine M. Sabiston with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine M. Sabiston more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine M. Sabiston
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine M. Sabiston. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine M. Sabiston. The network helps show where Catherine M. Sabiston may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Catherine M. Sabiston
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Catherine M. Sabiston. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Catherine M. Sabiston based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Catherine M. Sabiston. Catherine M. Sabiston is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 23 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 28 | |
| 19 | 17 | |
| 20 | 113 |
About Catherine M. Sabiston
Catherine M. Sabiston is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Pharmacy, having authored 384 papers that have together received 10.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (117 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (100 papers) and Physical Activity and Health (94 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (2.0k citations), Clinical Psychology (3.6k citations) and Social Psychology (2.9k citations). Catherine M. Sabiston has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jennifer Brunet, Peter R.E. Crocker, Jennifer O’Loughlin, Meghan H. McDonough, Eva Pila, Kent C. Kowalski, Garcia Ashdown‐Franks, Brendon Stubbs, Diane E. Mack and Steve Amireault. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.