Nadia Crittenden
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 10%
- Co-authors
- Peter CaputiPaul SmithJoseph CiarrochiPatrick RawstorneRohan JayasuriyaRon HendersonGerard StoylesTimothy R. Broady
- Topics
- Gender Diversity and Inequality (3 papers)Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers)Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Gender StudiesOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource ManagementInformation Systems and Management
- Partner nations
- Australia
In The Last Decade
Nadia Crittenden
11 papers receiving 370 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Gender Studies 151
- Sociology and Political Science 133
- Social Psychology 110
- Clinical Psychology 106
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 91
Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Crittenden
This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Crittenden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Crittenden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Crittenden more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Crittenden
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Crittenden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Crittenden. The network helps show where Nadia Crittenden may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nadia Crittenden
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nadia Crittenden. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nadia Crittenden based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nadia Crittenden. Nadia Crittenden is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | |
| 2 | 51 | |
| 3 | 60 | |
| 4 | 40 | |
| 5 | Personal construct methodology | 15 |
| 6 | 31 | |
| 7 | 30 | |
| 8 | 76 | |
| 9 | 39 | |
| 10 | 76 | |
| 11 | A Validation of an Information Systems Success Model in a Hospital Setting Using a Qualitative and Quantitative Approach | 1 |
| 12 | Thoughtful feeling and feelingful thinking - an evolutionary step | 0 |
About Nadia Crittenden
Nadia Crittenden is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Information Systems and Management, having authored 12 papers that have together received 434 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender Diversity and Inequality (3 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers) and Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (151 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (91 citations) and Information Systems and Management (54 citations). Nadia Crittenden has collaborated with scholars based in Australia. Frequent co-authors include Peter Caputi, Paul Smith, Joseph Ciarrochi, Patrick Rawstorne, Rohan Jayasuriya, Ron Henderson, Gerard Stoyles, Timothy R. Broady, Beverly M. Walker and Linda L. Viney. Their work appears in journals such as Computers in Human Behavior, Cognition & Emotion and British Journal of Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.