Kimberly E. Chaney

910 total citations
44 papers, 631 citations indexed

About

Kimberly E. Chaney is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Gender Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Kimberly E. Chaney has authored 44 papers receiving a total of 631 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 36 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 19 papers in Social Psychology and 17 papers in Gender Studies. Recurrent topics in Kimberly E. Chaney's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (32 papers), Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (16 papers) and Gender Diversity and Inequality (15 papers). Kimberly E. Chaney is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (32 papers), Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (16 papers) and Gender Diversity and Inequality (15 papers). Kimberly E. Chaney collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Czechia. Kimberly E. Chaney's co-authors include Diana T. Sanchez, Jessica D. Remedios, Nicholas P. Alt, Margaret Shih, Leigh S. Wilton, Danielle M. Young, Mary S. Himmelstein, Alison L. Chasteen, Janell C. Fetterolf and Nairán Ramírez‐Esparza and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Science, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and Frontiers in Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Kimberly E. Chaney

37 papers receiving 592 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kimberly E. Chaney United States 14 473 252 242 73 50 44 631
Sandrine Redersdorff France 10 273 0.6× 216 0.9× 102 0.4× 29 0.4× 21 0.4× 16 441
Aimee Y. Mark United States 6 439 0.9× 263 1.0× 200 0.8× 19 0.3× 19 0.4× 7 534
Mary L. Inman United States 11 543 1.1× 309 1.2× 187 0.8× 21 0.3× 20 0.4× 19 697
Ruth van Veelen Netherlands 12 272 0.6× 184 0.7× 131 0.5× 18 0.2× 59 1.2× 22 500
Philip J. Mazzocco United States 8 284 0.6× 118 0.5× 72 0.3× 96 1.3× 24 0.5× 17 511
Robert D. Carlisle United States 7 304 0.6× 271 1.1× 151 0.6× 51 0.7× 18 0.4× 9 556
Wind Goodfriend United States 10 268 0.6× 256 1.0× 211 0.9× 27 0.4× 58 1.2× 19 559
Amir Hetsroni Israel 13 185 0.4× 86 0.3× 176 0.7× 119 1.6× 23 0.5× 53 482
Amber M. Gaffney United States 12 343 0.7× 217 0.9× 104 0.4× 12 0.2× 72 1.4× 27 487
Joost M. Leunissen United Kingdom 11 202 0.4× 403 1.6× 135 0.6× 43 0.6× 67 1.3× 20 507

Countries citing papers authored by Kimberly E. Chaney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kimberly E. Chaney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kimberly E. Chaney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kimberly E. Chaney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kimberly E. Chaney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kimberly E. Chaney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kimberly E. Chaney. The network helps show where Kimberly E. Chaney may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kimberly E. Chaney

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kimberly E. Chaney. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kimberly E. Chaney based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kimberly E. Chaney. Kimberly E. Chaney is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Chaney, Kimberly E., et al.. (2025). White power on trial: Perceptions of antiracism organizations focusing on power versus discrimination. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 29(2). 219–243.
3.
Dickter, Cheryl L., et al.. (2025). The Effects of an Online Training on Cultural Competence, Acknowledgment of White Privilege, Ethnocultural Empathy, and Racial Attitudes in White College Students. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 55(9). 720–730. 1 indexed citations
4.
Oswald, Flora, et al.. (2025). Marginalized and Advantaged Parents’ Perceptions of Identity-Safety Cues in K-12 Classrooms. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 17(1). 47–62.
5.
Oswald, Flora, et al.. (2025). Cultural stereotypes and personal beliefs about thin people: A form of fat resistance. Body Image. 53. 101897–101897.
6.
Chaney, Kimberly E., et al.. (2025). Seeing Beyond Whose Prejudice? Effects of Perpetrator Race on People of Color’s Willingness to Engage in Solidarity Efforts With Perpetrators of Racism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 391249207–391249207.
8.
Chaney, Kimberly E., et al.. (2024). Our Wars Are the Same ”: (Horizontal) Collectivism Is Associated With Lay Theory of Generalized Prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 52(2). 349–363. 3 indexed citations
9.
Chaney, Kimberly E., et al.. (2024). Black Americans suppress emotions when prejudice is believed to stem from shared ignorance. Frontiers in Psychology. 15. 1336552–1336552. 3 indexed citations
10.
Oswald, Flora, et al.. (2024). Development and validation of the Abolitionist Ideology Scale with abolitionist‐identifying and nationally representative samples. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy. 25(1). 4 indexed citations
11.
Chaney, Kimberly E., et al.. (2023). Factors that contribute to accurately perceiving anti-black racism and sexism overlap. The Journal of Social Psychology. 164(6). 1066–1084. 1 indexed citations
12.
Chaney, Kimberly E. & Diana T. Sanchez. (2023). White women's automatic attentional adhesion to sexism in the face of racism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 110. 104540–104540. 3 indexed citations
13.
Chaney, Kimberly E., et al.. (2023). What Are We Fighting For? Lay Theories About the Goals and Motivations of Anti-Racism Activism. Race and Social Problems. 16(1). 65–85. 6 indexed citations
14.
Chaney, Kimberly E., et al.. (2023). “I am (oppressed), therefore I see”: Multiple stigmatized identities predict belief in generalized prejudice and intraminority coalition. Self and Identity. 22(6). 1000–1026. 12 indexed citations
15.
Chaney, Kimberly E.. (2022). Preconscious Attentional Bias to Rejection Facilitates Social Distancing for White Women in STEM Contexts. Social Cognition. 40(5). 438–458. 2 indexed citations
16.
Alt, Nicholas P., Kimberly E. Chaney, & Margaret Shih. (2018). “But that was meant to be a compliment!”: Evaluative costs of confronting positive racial stereotypes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 22(5). 655–672. 32 indexed citations
17.
Chaney, Kimberly E. & Diana T. Sanchez. (2017). Gender-Inclusive Bathrooms Signal Fairness Across Identity Dimensions. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 9(2). 245–253. 61 indexed citations
18.
Chaney, Kimberly E.. (2016). ENDS. Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University). 1 indexed citations
19.
Chaney, Kimberly E., Diana T. Sanchez, & Jessica D. Remedios. (2016). Organizational Identity Safety Cue Transfers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 42(11). 1564–1576. 80 indexed citations
20.
Chaney, Kimberly E., Danielle M. Young, & Diana T. Sanchez. (2015). Confrontation’s health outcomes and promotion of egalitarianism (C-HOPE) framework.. Translational Issues in Psychological Science. 1(4). 363–371. 21 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026