Vickie M. Williamson

1.4k total citations
28 papers, 980 citations indexed

About

Vickie M. Williamson is a scholar working on Education, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Vickie M. Williamson has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 980 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Education, 8 papers in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and 7 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Vickie M. Williamson's work include Science Education and Pedagogy (15 papers), Various Chemistry Research Topics (8 papers) and Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (7 papers). Vickie M. Williamson is often cited by papers focused on Science Education and Pedagogy (15 papers), Various Chemistry Research Topics (8 papers) and Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (7 papers). Vickie M. Williamson collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Vickie M. Williamson's co-authors include Michael R. Abraham, Susan L. Westbrook, Kenneth C. Williamson, Ghislain Deslongchamps, Mary Jane Shultz, Scott R. Hinze, David N. Rapp, Erik McKee, Roy Tasker and Guy Ashkenazi and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Research in Science Teaching and Cognitive Science.

In The Last Decade

Vickie M. Williamson

26 papers receiving 865 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Vickie M. Williamson United States 15 786 364 247 242 77 28 980
Gail Chittleborough Australia 12 1.0k 1.3× 503 1.4× 161 0.7× 216 0.9× 90 1.2× 36 1.2k
Michael R. Abraham United States 16 1.2k 1.5× 501 1.4× 209 0.8× 326 1.3× 84 1.1× 35 1.4k
Sascha Bernholt Germany 17 688 0.9× 418 1.1× 145 0.6× 139 0.6× 68 0.9× 53 896
Martina A. Rau United States 17 481 0.6× 407 1.1× 334 1.4× 46 0.2× 70 0.9× 53 898
Haluk Özmen Türkiye 19 1.0k 1.3× 351 1.0× 120 0.5× 187 0.8× 109 1.4× 63 1.1k
Diane M. Bunce United States 13 583 0.7× 265 0.7× 127 0.5× 119 0.5× 58 0.8× 27 814
Roy Tasker Australia 11 374 0.5× 210 0.6× 139 0.6× 79 0.3× 90 1.2× 34 666
Nathaniel P. Grove United States 12 791 1.0× 365 1.0× 128 0.5× 480 2.0× 45 0.6× 20 979
Sevil Akaygün Türkiye 13 591 0.8× 278 0.8× 194 0.8× 95 0.4× 65 0.8× 34 723
Maja Planinić Croatia 16 624 0.8× 261 0.7× 201 0.8× 39 0.2× 33 0.4× 30 860

Countries citing papers authored by Vickie M. Williamson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Vickie M. Williamson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vickie M. Williamson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vickie M. Williamson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Vickie M. Williamson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vickie M. Williamson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vickie M. Williamson. The network helps show where Vickie M. Williamson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Vickie M. Williamson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Vickie M. Williamson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Vickie M. Williamson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Vickie M. Williamson. Vickie M. Williamson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Alivio, Theodore E. G., et al.. (2024). Item Analysis of Math-Up Skills Test (MUST) Questions After an Early Math Intervention: Student Performance in General Chemistry as a Function of Various Arithmetic Categories. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 33(6). 970–982. 2 indexed citations
2.
Dubrovskiy, Anton V., Rebecca Weber, Diana S. Mason, et al.. (2021). Is the STEM Gender Gap Closing?. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5(1). 47–68. 7 indexed citations
3.
Williamson, Vickie M., et al.. (2021). The Relationship Between a Student’s Success in First-Semester General Chemistry and Their Mathematics Fluency, Profile, and Performance on Common Questions. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 31(1). 1–15. 5 indexed citations
4.
Powell, Cynthia B., et al.. (2020). Impact of arithmetic automaticity on students' success in second-semester general chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. 21(4). 1028–1041. 18 indexed citations
5.
Alivio, Theodore E. G., et al.. (2020). How Does a Math Review Impact a Student’s Arithmetic Skills and Performance in First-Semester General Chemistry?. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 29(6). 703–712. 7 indexed citations
6.
Williamson, Vickie M., Blain Mamiya, Cynthia B. Powell, et al.. (2019). Impact of basic arithmetic skills on success in first-semester general chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. 21(1). 51–61. 26 indexed citations
7.
Williamson, Vickie M., et al.. (2019). Timing of Homework Completion vs. Performance in General Chemistry. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 28(5). 523–531. 8 indexed citations
8.
Williamson, Vickie M., et al.. (2017). How do general chemistry students’ impressions, attitudes, perceived learning, and course performance vary with the arrangement of homework questions and E-text?. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. 18(4). 785–797. 6 indexed citations
9.
10.
Hinze, Scott R., Vickie M. Williamson, Mary Jane Shultz, et al.. (2013). When do spatial abilities support student comprehension of STEM visualizations?. Cognitive Processing. 14(2). 129–142. 28 indexed citations
11.
Hinze, Scott R., David N. Rapp, Vickie M. Williamson, et al.. (2013). Beyond ball-and-stick: Students' processing of novel STEM visualizations. Learning and Instruction. 26. 12–21. 54 indexed citations
12.
Hinze, Scott R., David N. Rapp, Vickie M. Williamson, et al.. (2011). Unlocking potential: Individual differences in the use of concurrent scientific visualizations.. Cognitive Science. 33(33).
13.
Williamson, Vickie M., et al.. (2009). Surveying Students' Attitudes and Perceptions toward Guided-Inquiry and Open-Inquiry Laboratories. Journal of Chemical Education. 86(12). 1427–1427. 57 indexed citations
14.
Williamson, Vickie M., et al.. (2008). The Effects of a Two-Year Molecular Visualization Experience on Teachers' Attitudes, Content Knowledge, and Spatial Ability. Journal of Chemical Education. 85(5). 718–718. 18 indexed citations
15.
Williamson, Vickie M., et al.. (2005). Molecular Visualization in Science Education: An Evaluation of the NSF-Sponsored Workshop. Journal of Chemical Education. 82(6). 937–937. 18 indexed citations
16.
Williamson, Vickie M., et al.. (2004). The Use of Video Demonstrations and Particulate Animation in General Chemistry. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 13(3). 315–323. 66 indexed citations
17.
Williamson, Vickie M., et al.. (2004). Testing Students' Use of the Particulate Theory. Journal of Chemical Education. 81(6). 891–891. 12 indexed citations
18.
Williamson, Vickie M. & M. W. Rowe. (2002). Group Problem-Solving versus Lecture in College-Level Quantitative Analysis: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. Journal of Chemical Education. 79(9). 1131–1131. 22 indexed citations
19.
Williamson, Vickie M. & Michael R. Abraham. (1995). The effects of computer animation on the particulate mental models of college chemistry students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 32(5). 521–534. 264 indexed citations
20.
Abraham, Michael R., Vickie M. Williamson, & Susan L. Westbrook. (1994). A cross‐age study of the understanding of five chemistry concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 31(2). 147–165. 216 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Gail Chittleborough Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Michael R. Abraham Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sascha Bernholt Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Martina A. Rau Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Haluk Özmen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Diane M. Bunce Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Roy Tasker Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Nathaniel P. Grove Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sevil Akaygün Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Maja Planinić
Rankless by CCL
2026