Mary Jane Shultz

3.7k citations
82 papers · 3.2k indexed · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

Mary Jane Shultz

78 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers

Mary Jane Shultz
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Filtration and Separation 210
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 2.1k
  • Spectroscopy 901
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 436
  • Electrochemistry 298
Replace Marcel D. Baer with:
Marcel D. Baer United States
Paulo B. Miranda Brazil
Satoshi Nihonyanagi Japan
Ellen H. G. Backus Germany
Chuanshan Tian China
Eric Tyrode Sweden
Poul B. Petersen United States
Victor Ostroverkhov United States
R. Kramer Campen Germany
Tatsuya Ishiyama Japan
Mary Jane Shultz relative to Marcel D. Baer United States Marcel D. Baer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Marcel D. Baer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mary Jane Shultz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Jane Shultz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Jane Shultz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Jane Shultz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Jane Shultz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Jane Shultz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Jane Shultz. The network helps show where Mary Jane Shultz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mary Jane Shultz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mary Jane Shultz Line = papers co-authored together Mary Jane Shultz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20242
3 20240
4 20233
5 201719
6 201725
7 201328
8 201326
9 201312
10
Unlocking potential: Individual differences in the use of concurrent scientific visualizations.
20110
11 20109
12 201025
13 201014
14 200799
15 200715
16 2006395
17 2005108
18 200119
19 199943
20 1999137

About Mary Jane Shultz

Mary Jane Shultz is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Filtration and Separation, Electrochemistry and Atmospheric Science, having authored 82 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (52 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (27 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (14 papers), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (9 papers), nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions (8 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (7 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (7 papers) and Thermodynamic properties of mixtures (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Filtration and Separation (210 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (2.1k citations), Spectroscopy (901 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (436 citations) and Electrochemistry (298 citations). Mary Jane Shultz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Steve Baldelli, Cheryl Schnitzer, Henning Groenzin, Chuanyi Wang, Margaret Kuo, Patrick Bisson, Dave Campbell, Heather C. Allen, Sandhya Gopalakrishnan and Dingfang Liu. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, Chemical Physics Letters and The Journal of Physical Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026