Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Problems Associated With Spray Drying Of Sugar-Rich Foods
1997496 citationsBhesh Bhandari, Tony Howes et al.Drying Technologyprofile →
Implication of glass transition for the drying and stability of dried foods
1999486 citationsBhesh Bhandari, Tony Howesprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Tony Howes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tony Howes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tony Howes more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tony Howes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tony Howes. The network helps show where Tony Howes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tony Howes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tony Howes.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tony Howes based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Tony Howes. Tony Howes is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Anjum, Rashid, et al.. (2011). Nucleation kinetics for ibuprofen crystals grown from aqueous ethanol. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 325.
5.
Rashid, Abdur, et al.. (2011). Effect of high shear wet milling (HSWM) of recrystallized ibuprofen particles on its flow properties for solid dosage pharmaceutical formulation. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 1581.1 indexed citations
6.
Rashid, Abdur, et al.. (2010). Growth Rates of Ibuprofen Crystals Grown from Ethanol. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 1797.3 indexed citations
7.
Liu, Lian X., et al.. (2008). Effect of Particle Properties on the Compaction of Ibuprofen Powders. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 1154–1163.1 indexed citations
8.
Rashid, Abdur, et al.. (2008). Racemic Ibuprofen Solubility in Ethanol and Aqueous Ethanolic Mixtures. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 1393–1401.4 indexed citations
Neumann, Lukas, et al.. (2003). What Does a Mean Size Mean. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 2003. 928.2 indexed citations
Howes, Tony, et al.. (2002). Long term monitoring of estuarine water quality: Brisbane River turbidity. Water. 29(6). 37–39.6 indexed citations
15.
Hapgood, Karen, James D. Litster, Simon Biggs, & Tony Howes. (2002). Drop Penetration into Porous Powder Beds. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 253(2). 353–366.223 indexed citations
Bhandari, Bhesh & Tony Howes. (2000). Glass transition in processing and stability of food. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland).12 indexed citations
Howes, Tony & Mark Caleb Smith. (1996). An LDAP URL Format. RFC. 1959. 1–4.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.