Powder Technology

18.7k papers and 495.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 18.7k papers published in Powder Technology in the last decades have received a total of 495.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Powder Technology usually cover Computational Mechanics (9.0k papers), Mechanical Engineering (6.8k papers) and Ocean Engineering (3.5k papers) specifically the topics of Granular flow and fluidized beds (7.4k papers), Mineral Processing and Grinding (3.3k papers) and Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows (2.9k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Powder Technology are D. Geldart, Aibing Yu, Jennifer L. Sinclair, Toshitsugu Tanaka, Yutaka Tsuji, Octave Levenspiel, L.G. Austin, Colin Thornton, D.D. Ganji and Fernando J. Muzzio.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Powder Technology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Powder Technology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Powder Technology.

Countries where authors publish in Powder Technology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Powder Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Powder Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Powder Technology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025