Tim Kühl

852 citations
30 papers · 613 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Tim Kühl

27 papers receiving 594 citations

Peers

Tim Kühl
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 375
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 274
  • Human-Computer Interaction 63
  • Automotive Engineering 90
  • Education 166
Replace Laura J. Massa with:
Laura J. Massa United States
Juan C. Castro-Alonso Australia
Maria Opfermann Germany
Ulrich Glowalla Germany
Raedy M. Ping United States
Allison J. Jaeger United States
Benjamin D. Jee United States
Neil H. Schwartz United States
Joseph P. Magliano United States
Sandra Berney Switzerland
Tim Kühl relative to Laura J. Massa United States Laura J. Massa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Laura J. Massa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tim Kühl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tim Kühl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim Kühl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim Kühl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tim Kühl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim Kühl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim Kühl. The network helps show where Tim Kühl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Tim Kühl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tim Kühl Line = papers co-authored together Tim Kühl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201065
2 201462
3 201051
4 201643
5 201642
6 201542
7 201433
8 201629
9 201828
10 201225
11 202124
12 201720
13 201819
14 201719
15 201818
16 201417
17 202210
18 201810
19 20179
20 20119

About Tim Kühl

Tim Kühl is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology, Education and Automotive Engineering, having authored 30 papers that have together received 613 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (24 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (9 papers), Communication in Education and Healthcare (6 papers), Spatial Cognition and Navigation (5 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (4 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (4 papers), Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (3 papers) and Online and Blended Learning (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (375 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (274 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (63 citations), Automotive Engineering (90 citations) and Education (166 citations). Tim Kühl has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Alexander Eitel, Peter Gerjets, Katharina Scheiter, Stefan Münzer, Sven Gemballa, Ferdinand Stebner, Steffi Zander, Hermann Körndle, Joachim Wirth and Paul Ayres. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Computers & Education, Applied Cognitive Psychology and Learning and Instruction.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact