Sue Cranmer

2.0k total citations · 2 hit papers
35 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Sue Cranmer is a scholar working on Education, Information Systems and Gender Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Sue Cranmer has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Education, 7 papers in Information Systems and 5 papers in Gender Studies. Recurrent topics in Sue Cranmer's work include Child Development and Digital Technology (10 papers), Education and Technology Integration (6 papers) and Gender and Technology in Education (5 papers). Sue Cranmer is often cited by papers focused on Child Development and Digital Technology (10 papers), Education and Technology Integration (6 papers) and Gender and Technology in Education (5 papers). Sue Cranmer collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Denmark and Australia. Sue Cranmer's co-authors include Geoff Mason, Gareth Williams, John Potter, Neil Selwyn, Rebekah Willett, David Buckingham, Diane Carr, Gareth Williams, David Guile and Shakuntala Banaji and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Studies in Higher Education and British Journal of Educational Technology.

In The Last Decade

Sue Cranmer

31 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Hit Papers

Enhancing graduate employability: best intentions and mix... 2006 2026 2012 2019 2006 2008 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sue Cranmer United Kingdom 12 987 195 192 181 117 35 1.3k
Beverley Oliver Australia 15 870 0.9× 92 0.5× 90 0.5× 170 0.9× 51 0.4× 44 1.1k
Marcel Robles United States 3 525 0.5× 90 0.5× 163 0.8× 101 0.6× 130 1.1× 4 947
Philip C. Candy Australia 14 805 0.8× 76 0.4× 66 0.3× 75 0.4× 65 0.6× 34 1.2k
Dominique Simone Rychen 7 970 1.0× 232 1.2× 65 0.3× 38 0.2× 47 0.4× 8 1.4k
Robert B. Barr United States 4 1.5k 1.5× 102 0.5× 49 0.3× 201 1.1× 120 1.0× 8 1.9k
Paul Ashwin United Kingdom 22 1.2k 1.2× 204 1.0× 36 0.2× 76 0.4× 42 0.4× 67 1.6k
Jane Andrews United States 9 645 0.7× 53 0.3× 172 0.9× 140 0.8× 125 1.1× 38 922
Tom Bourner United Kingdom 19 764 0.8× 77 0.4× 271 1.4× 51 0.3× 116 1.0× 81 1.3k
Roland Simons Australia 9 834 0.8× 113 0.6× 277 1.4× 69 0.4× 236 2.0× 16 1.7k
Maureen Tam Hong Kong 15 577 0.6× 94 0.5× 98 0.5× 50 0.3× 49 0.4× 35 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Sue Cranmer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sue Cranmer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sue Cranmer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sue Cranmer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sue Cranmer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sue Cranmer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sue Cranmer. The network helps show where Sue Cranmer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sue Cranmer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sue Cranmer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sue Cranmer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sue Cranmer. Sue Cranmer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Cranmer, Sue. (2019). Disabled children's evolving digital use practices to support formal learning. A missed opportunity for inclusion. British Journal of Educational Technology. 51(2). 315–330. 18 indexed citations
2.
Lewin, Cathy, Sue Cranmer, & Sarah McNicol. (2018). Developing digital pedagogy through learning design: An activity theory perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology. 49(6). 1131–1144. 28 indexed citations
3.
Dohn, Nina Bonderup, et al.. (2018). Networked Learning. University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark). 6 indexed citations
4.
Cranmer, Sue & Cathy Lewin. (2017). iTEC: conceptualising, realising and recognising pedagogical and technological innovation in European classrooms. Technology Pedagogy and Education. 26(4). 409–423. 7 indexed citations
5.
Cranmer, Sue. (2017). Disabled children and young people’s uses and experiences of digital technologies for learning. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University). 3 indexed citations
6.
Cranmer, Sue, Nina Bonderup Dohn, Maarten de Laat, Thomas Ryberg, & Julie‐Ann Sime. (2016). Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Networked Learning 2016. 1 indexed citations
7.
Cranmer, Sue, Nina Bonderup Dohn, Maarten de Laat, Thomas Ryberg, & Julie‐Ann Sime. (2016). Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Networked Learning. 7 indexed citations
8.
Cranmer, Sue, et al.. (2014). "Laptops are better." Medical students' perceptions of laptops versus tablets and smartphones to support their learning. Proceedings of the International Conference on Networked Learning. 9. 67–75. 1 indexed citations
9.
Cranmer, Sue, et al.. (2012). Console Game-Based Pedagogy.
10.
Selwyn, Neil, John Potter, & Sue Cranmer. (2010). Primary schools and ICT: learning from pupil perspectives. LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas). 15 indexed citations
11.
Selwyn, Neil, John Potter, & Sue Cranmer. (2010). Primary Schools and ICT. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University). 5 indexed citations
12.
Banaji, Shakuntala, Sue Cranmer, & Carlo Perrotta. (2010). Expert perspectives on creativity and innovation in european schools and teacher training: enabling factors and barriers to creativity and innovation in compulsory education in Europe, based on interviews with educational stakeholders. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 3 indexed citations
13.
Cranmer, Sue, et al.. (2008). Evaluation of e-learning courses. IOE EPrints. 1 indexed citations
14.
Cranmer, Sue, John Potter, & Neil Selwyn. (2008). Learners and technology: 7-11. Digital Education Resource Archive (University College London). 3 indexed citations
15.
Selwyn, Neil, John Potter, & Sue Cranmer. (2008). Primary pupils' use of information and communication technologies at school and home. British Journal of Educational Technology. 40(5). 919–932. 65 indexed citations
16.
Buckingham, David, Rebekah Willett, Shakuntala Banaji, & Sue Cranmer. (2007). Media Smart Be Adwise 2: an evaluation. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 5 indexed citations
17.
Cranmer, Sue. (2006). Children and young people’s uses of the Internet for homework. Learning Media and Technology. 31(3). 301–315. 32 indexed citations
18.
Buckingham, David, Shakuntala Banaji, Diane Carr, Sue Cranmer, & Rebekah Willett. (2005). The media literacy of children and young people: a review of the research literature. IOE EPrints. 71 indexed citations
19.
Cranmer, Sue, et al.. (2004). Putting good practice into practice: literacy, numeracy and key skills within apprenticeships: an evaluation of the LSDA development project. Digital Education Resource Archive (University College London).
20.
Mason, Geoff, Gareth Williams, Sue Cranmer, & David Guile. (2003). How much does Higher Education enhance the employability of graduates. 83 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026