Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Postdigital science and education
2018364 citationsPetar Jandrić, Jeremy Knox et al.Educational Philosophy and Theoryprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Ryberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Ryberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Ryberg more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Ryberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Ryberg. The network helps show where Thomas Ryberg may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Ryberg
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Ryberg.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Ryberg based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Ryberg. Thomas Ryberg is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Dalsgaard, Christian, et al.. (2018). Students' digital learning environments. Proceedings of the International Conference on Networked Learning. 11. 165–172.4 indexed citations
7.
Skov, Mette, et al.. (2018). Pathway to Support the Adoption of PBL in Open Data Education.. VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet). 23(2). 175–193.3 indexed citations
8.
Jandrić, Petar, Jeremy Knox, Tina Besley, et al.. (2018). Postdigital science and education. Educational Philosophy and Theory. 50(10). 893–899.364 indexed citations breakdown →
Ryberg, Thomas, Jacob Davidsen, & Vivien Hodgson. (2016). Problem and project based learning in hybrid spaces : nomads and artisans. VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet).2 indexed citations
11.
Davidsen, Jacob & Thomas Ryberg. (2015). Exploring the Material Conditions of Learning: Opportunities and Challenges for CSCL. Computer Supported Collaborative Learning.4 indexed citations
12.
Ryberg, Thomas, et al.. (2012). Introducing blended e-learning course design: A pre-implementation assessment of students’ basic ICT skills. VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet). 214–219.1 indexed citations
13.
Tambouris, Efthimios, Eleni Panopoulou, Konstantinos Tarabanis, et al.. (2012). Enabling Problem Based Learning through Web 2.0 Technologies: PBL 2.0. Educational Technology & Society. 15(4). 238–251.33 indexed citations
14.
Khalid, Md. Saifuddin, et al.. (2011). ICT support for students’ collaboration in problem and project based learning. VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet). 351–363.9 indexed citations
Ponti, Marisa & Thomas Ryberg. (2004). Rethinking virtual space as a place for socialisation: Theory and design implications. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.