Stacy L. Bliss
- Education top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Statistics and Probability top 5%
- Social Psychology
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Co-authors
- Christopher H. SkinnerSherry K. BainRobert L. WilliamsJacqueline WilliamsElizabeth McCallumEunjung OhDaniel F. McClearyKathryn E. Jaspers
- Topics
- Behavioral and Psychological Studies (4 papers)Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (3 papers)Reading and Literacy Development (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Stacy L. Bliss
14 papers receiving 274 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Education 151
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 145
- Statistics and Probability 88
- Social Psychology 63
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 50
Countries citing papers authored by Stacy L. Bliss
This map shows the geographic impact of Stacy L. Bliss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stacy L. Bliss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stacy L. Bliss more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stacy L. Bliss
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stacy L. Bliss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stacy L. Bliss. The network helps show where Stacy L. Bliss may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stacy L. Bliss
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stacy L. Bliss. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stacy L. Bliss based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stacy L. Bliss. Stacy L. Bliss is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 31 | |
| 5 | 41 | |
| 6 | Christian conservatism and prominent sociopolitical values among teacher-education students in a southeastern university | 2 |
| 7 | 23 | |
| 8 | 47 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | Christian conservatism and militarism among teacher education students | 9 |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 62 | |
| 14 | 29 | |
| 15 | 16 |
About Stacy L. Bliss
Stacy L. Bliss is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability and Education, having authored 15 papers that have together received 306 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral and Psychological Studies (4 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (3 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (145 citations), Statistics and Probability (88 citations) and Education (151 citations). Stacy L. Bliss has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Christopher H. Skinner, Sherry K. Bain, Robert L. Williams, Jacqueline Williams, Elizabeth McCallum, Eunjung Oh, Daniel F. McCleary, Kathryn E. Jaspers and Robert L. Williams. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of School Psychology, School Psychology Review and Psychology in the Schools.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.