Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Challenges of Achieving Equity Within Public School Gifted and Talented Programs
2021100 citationsScott J. PetersGifted Child Quarterlyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Scott J. Peters
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott J. Peters's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott J. Peters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott J. Peters more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott J. Peters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott J. Peters. The network helps show where Scott J. Peters may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Scott J. Peters
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Scott J. Peters.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Scott J. Peters based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Scott J. Peters. Scott J. Peters is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Peters, Scott J., et al.. (2008). Unsettling a Settled Discourse: Faculty Views of the Meaning and Significance of the Land-Grant Mission. Journal of higher education outreach & engagement. 12(2). 33–66.12 indexed citations
13.
Peters, Scott J.. (2004). Educating the Civic Professional: Reconfigurations and Resistances.. The Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association. 11(1). 47–58.12 indexed citations
14.
Peters, Scott J., Nicholas R. Jordan, Theodore R. Alter, & Jeffrey C. Bridger. (2003). The Craft of Public Scholarship in Land-Grant Education. Journal of higher education outreach & engagement. 8(1). 75–86.16 indexed citations
15.
Peters, Scott J.. (2003). Reconstructing Civic Professionalism in Academic Life: A Response to Mark Wood’s Paper, “From Service to Solidarity”. Journal of higher education outreach & engagement. 8(2). 183–198.7 indexed citations
16.
Peters, Scott J.. (2002). Citizens Developing a Voice at the Table: A Story of Educational Organizing in Contemporary Extension Work.. TigerPrints (Clemson University). 40(4).8 indexed citations
17.
Peters, Scott J.. (2002). Rousing the People on the Land: The Roots of the Educational Organizing Tradition in Extension Work.. TigerPrints (Clemson University). 40(3).31 indexed citations
18.
Peters, Scott J.. (2000). The Formative Politics of Outreach Scholarship. Journal of higher education outreach & engagement. 6(1). 23–30.16 indexed citations
19.
Peters, Scott J.. (1998). It can happen to you. Why you should carry your own malpractice insurance.. PubMed. 6(10). 67–8, 92.1 indexed citations
20.
Peters, Scott J.. (1993). A New Citizenship in the Making. 24(1). 45–50.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.