Sarah Hug

458 total citations
44 papers, 270 citations indexed

About

Sarah Hug is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Media Technology and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah Hug has authored 44 papers receiving a total of 270 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Computer Science Applications, 16 papers in Media Technology and 15 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Sarah Hug's work include Teaching and Learning Programming (23 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (11 papers) and Gender and Technology in Education (6 papers). Sarah Hug is often cited by papers focused on Teaching and Learning Programming (23 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (11 papers) and Gender and Technology in Education (6 papers). Sarah Hug collaborates with scholars based in United States, Puerto Rico and Canada. Sarah Hug's co-authors include Andrew A. Zucker, Heather Thiry, Ann Q. Gates, Wendy DuBow, Elizabeth Litzler, John Fernandez, Mohsen Beheshti, Malek Adjouadi, A. Susan Jurow and Richard Aló and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Engineering Education, Journal of Science Education and Technology and ACM Transactions on Computing Education.

In The Last Decade

Sarah Hug

35 papers receiving 244 citations

Peers

Sarah Hug
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Education 140
  • Computer Science Applications 116
  • Information Systems 59
  • Safety Research 54
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 50
Replace Külli Kori with:
Külli Kori Estonia
Eno Tõnisson Estonia
Faye Miller United States
Olga Belikov United States
Dorian Stoilescu Canada
Ajda Kahveci United States
Steven C. Mills United States
Claudette M. Rasmussen United States
Janet Buckenmeyer United States
Gretchen Lowerison Canada
Külli Kori Estonia View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Sarah Hug
Sarah Hug · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Sarah Hug
Sarah Hug · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Hug

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Hug's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Hug with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Hug more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Hug

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Hug. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Hug. The network helps show where Sarah Hug may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Hug

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Hug. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Hug based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Hug. Sarah Hug is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 1
2 1
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 1
7
Balancing Acts: Managing the Tensions Inherent in Long-Term Youth-Led Projects.
0
8 1
9 1
10 1
11 0
12 1
13 3
14
"We should all help each other": Latina undergraduates' practices and identities in the figured world of computing.
3
15 34
16 12
17 26
18 22
19 1
20
A Study of the 1:1 Laptop Program at the Denver School of Science & Technology.
14

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026